User login
Clan rank discusion
24. August 2006 - 14:23
#11
Clan rank discusion
Quote:
Quote: secret said :wtf who told you that? lol
well, thats not true... ofc CTF is still our real element but we also still kick ass in TDM/Tag Razz
mm lol? it's only you who told me that EN stoped TDM/TAG in e5 i got our conversation when i asked you for a cw and you said me :
Quote:
secret msn conversation 07/08/2006
"we arent interested in playing cws on e5 because of the abuseable switchtime... " ; "so we would prefer another cfg then" ; "ehm check the config on "kill the enemy en ctf/tag"... that would be a nice config... just try it..."
maybe you changed position about cw since last weeks... 
. for me that is not a problem, but don't say that i am a lyer 
thx... ok, that is past, so now you play e5 tdm/tag? i am lost, tell us :roll: (i need know if we can challenge EN or not)
Quote:
ehm we got a collection on our forum:
http://2sweet.excessiveplus.net/xsiv/board/viewtopic.php?t=284
yes, i know that is realy nice to got it. thx 
. but not all players know that EN did this forum (and at my home www.excessivenature.net doesn't work, so hard to find the forum). so it's why i thinked better to put it here as official . maybe you could post it if you agree 
about ptl, yes we played already it in cw and there are somes strange settings. but why not try to play it and solves them 
(ptl could be realy nice to play in team).
about rules : thx rena and bodz for did it
24. August 2006 - 14:51
#12
Clan rank discusion
ptl is still bugged
24. August 2006 - 20:56
#14
Clan rank discusion
emm yeah so many off topic stuff. anyway i can just say pgv wont play with for example: ff, cuz its shit in e5. atm i dunno e5 clans will play with new ene+.cfg or old e5? cuz if with new, its base we start the rank since now. but i dont know which clan prefer switchwhore championship and which prefer lower switchtime. my personal opinion is about new cfg cuz i think now e5 its about " who can switch faster" game. and i dont like it. i hope im not alone here. there r some master in switchwhoring... i think they dont wanna play with new cfg. btw pgv ofc in, in the rank and will play cws, after all player is back. it takes 1-2 weeks. when school starts i hope all member back. and ANX clan, funmatch only? u should train more and play some real match. and kb EN kickass in tag/tdm? 
we will see it ... 
btw i havent heard any cw in the last some week in e5 part, so i know nothing about cws. maybe its my pb. but if someone wanna challange us, dont wait. just drop me a message. and bodz in drt ? lol n1. cu later, and green stfu dont smoke a lot
24. August 2006 - 21:31
#15
Clan rank discusion
lol@nagyi. We playd war last sunday with bnt but setesh and gasol dont want 2 participate in this ranking so i guess {FUC} will stay out of here (if u wanna know why talk with them )... btw nagyi i cant kick ur ass in sod now cuz i cant connect 2 any 1.16 server and i duno why :'(
24. August 2006 - 21:39
#16
![S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]](/files/screenname/fb48bf71f868792b4724881a0b7912c5.webp "S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]"){kind=small}
Clan rank discusion
@ Nagyi...
this here is no league...
its only meant to rank the official clanwars here you usually play against other clans.
cfg will be an arrangement between the 2 playing clans as also all the other settings.
the rules are giving some advices for the settings tho... but finally its up to the clans.
so you can arrange your clanwars like always... and then simply post them here to be ranked
and about your challenge request... you should have 2 on your table by us or you just forgot it again. Prolly you shouldnt drink that much then --> MSN
24. August 2006 - 23:48
#17
Clan rank discusion
i can't understand why FUC doesn't want to join this rankboard and at least why they don't wanna talk about what they "dislike" or "refuse" in this thread. The few reasons/probs your told me on msn were handled easily and sounded for me really not important. Anyway we force none but i just wana understand exactly their decision...
btw i don't know how many times i asked also pgv to play, i don't know if we can play ctf, need to check now but others gametypes should be ok in a few time
25. August 2006 - 8:19
#18
![mow Q [EN]](/files/screenname/8646b528fbbe1090dc61e0f29405d1b3.webp "mow Q [EN]"){kind=small}
Clan rank discusion
I don't understand, why people not think about first, before they denie.
- The rank is no league, it is just to collect played wars, to have a lil scoreboard and a little bit statistics
- Any problems like "which config", "frienldy fire or not", "server" and so forth, can be arranged before war, where is the prob with such stuff
- U can still play not ranked wars called "friendly wars" and "ranked" wars anyway, it is a think of agreement.
and if FUC doesnt play ranked wars, i bet they wont receive much offers anymore to play wars.
I suggest for e5 playres who are unsure, read the bropart of ranking, and read all topics in e5-part of ranking carefully.
U are forced to nothing, anything is just a point of arrangement under the clans, if u play "pb pure" or "not", if u use "ff" or not, and so forth.
[/]
25. August 2006 - 10:32
#19
![[ZER]Strahli*](/files/screenname/30ad45ff3020b13a3474679c006746a4.webp "[ZER]Strahli*"){kind=small}
Clan rank discusion
i write it here, bec i think it is quite displaced in the "rules proposel" topic
Quote:
apocalyser2
we will get differents ranks for each gametype ctf/tfm/tag/pl?
i thought so, or??
Quote:
apocalyser2
because we don't know all clans playing e5, and i know that for example EN stoped tdm/tag and X play only tag/tdm.... so got a list of clans with gametype they play will be nice
yeah, right above here, would be nice...
/callvote every leader should write (edit) in the proposel for this ranking what gametype clan play and perhaps some other impotant stuff (like "only e5", "only cws on friday", "no pure" )
Linux is like a wigwam - no gates, no windows, APACHE inside!
http://www.zerclan.de
get e6.cfg here!!!
25. August 2006 - 13:52
#20
Clan rank discusion
Quote:
* The rank is no league, it is just to collect played wars, to have a lil scoreboard and a little bit statistics
* Any problems like "which config", "frienldy fire or not", "server" and so forth, can be arranged before war, where is the prob with such stuff
* U can still play not ranked wars called "friendly wars" and "ranked" wars anyway, it is a think of agreement.U are forced to nothing, anything is just a point of arrangement under the clans, if u play "pb pure" or "not", if u use "ff" or not, and so forth.
yes i told them this but they r unbrakeable lol 
, gasol said that he dont like rankings (and thats all, wtf?! :roll:), and setesh said that the rules r not right (in polite way lol) i think his main point is about "agreement" about pb pure ff and so on b4 the war, he told that if we want make ranking fair it should be posted in rules not discussed and there r some more minor problems..
Quote:
and if FUC doesnt play ranked wars, i bet they wont receive much offers anymore to play wars.
yes im scared of it 2 i told them it b4 but it seems they r still unbrakeable stone heads
Shout 13:11:14
: Steff, traitor. That’s a valid message
: Enter a valid Message
: Me, lol
: hello!
: I hope you had a good reason to be absent. Get well soon, my friend.
: Impressive
: I am half Russian and half black. I'm black on the bottom half. Don't forget to lubricate your ass
: ok, bring it on analbolic hohol
: Come tomorrow to watch my battle with ShadyХУЙ at SexyFraggers 8 on central european, 22:00 Moscow time. He said he would win because he was a deft monkey. ХУЙ don't forget to put on makeup, I'll record us on video. You must be beautiful.
: broheim it is oke!!! I saw Moldova elections on the news, and referendum before that. HOPE life will get better (but nothing ever changes)
Who's online
There are currently 2 users and 12 guests online.
first of all I feel sry that we are getting so much off topic here... would an admin pls pick out all the off-topic posts and move them to another/a new topic? thx in advance
first of all I didnt call you a liar! I just pointed out you had wrong information... or in this case a wrong interpretation...
My quote out of the MSN convo is fully right. But there is nothing about "we dont play TDM/Tag anymore".
I just told you that we would prefer a lower switchtime...
We usually let the challenged choose most stuff. (for you e5.cfg, tdm and 2of3 maps when we challenged you)
And since you challenged us we asked for a cfg with a lower switchtime
As it should be known our homepage is offline since mid of April.
I will talk to rena 
Ofc there is no problem putting a thread like that into this forum.
again sry for off-topic. ezek lets talk further on msn to avoid the off-topic here.
and I please an admin to move the off-topic posts to a new topic.. thx!
!!newest e6 (E+1.04)!!
e6 (E+1.03)