Loosingpackets
second that. this is not a votable discussion. if the 2 clans agree to play each other under certain conditions, thats their business. if someone has a problem with playing a clan some of whose members have high packetloss and are difficult to hit then dont play them.
altho this mite be an issue for leagues in which its necassary for clans to play every other clan. i guess the only solution is for a ref to resolve the issue.
imo deciding this issue based on quantified packetloss is childish. packetloss is not the only issue that affects how hittable a person is.
@mow - saying this is almost like racism is just plain inaccurate. theres a HUUUUUUUUGE difference and its pretty damn obvious. in this case the vote is on a serious issue and if u have high packetloss and ur getting difficult to hit, someone complaining about it has a legitimate concern.
I voted 0-5% packetloss can play -- 6-10% isn't really acceptable because if I have 10% and the other player also has 10%, that makes it even harder to hit him/her...
try aiming
I wouldn't call it racism. When one lags heavily, it certainly isn't the other player's fault and the player has a right to complain. Competition is supposed to be fair and if one player cannot show up in fair conditions then maybe he shouldn't play.
@tyrant, when i begun to read ur post i thought, what stupide, nut neverminde, ifinished your post
@dragon
as long u dont know about what u are writing, pls stop writing
@wonko, i am really accurate here, because the most people, who have packetlost are still good to hit, llike serlant, it is just their connection, they cant get better with their connection, they have just the fucking possiblity to play with that connection, no other way.
an still, there are people stilll playing with modem.
And is fucing nearly like racism, if u dont allow such people to play cws.
And about the point, that clans itself should have the ability to decicde about it, wouldnt be fair. A clan can use it for own advantage
Even with demo u can not prove, that the guy was really jearking, u can just prove, that that guy ha d packetslost, but NOT THAT HE WAS MISLEADING clanmatch
If there one time will come a rule!...., which dissallow players, with bad connection, will be not allowed to play in a cw, i dont think that i personally will c a sense, to play against clans who support this rule.
In most cws u dont have that problem, but if, it is mainly just 1 person (not each time, but mainly).
And dissalllow players to play cws, my dear wonko, whho i reall like, just because of a not good connection, is like racism. It is like to move people back to their nativ county, just because they dont really know the language.!!!
I dont think u, in US have that much probs with racism, as WE, in Germany, so, theiris maybe no way to understand it, but germany is the country where racism is born, with the commmon knowledge, even if we have nowadays nothing to do, what happenen in passsstttt!!!!!!
THis threas is in my eyes, and it is my personall opinion, becasuse i really thought about it, more that just once, and before e+ was excist!!!!!
THis is racism!!!! and not just close too!!!!!1
I wouldn't call it racism. When one lags heavily, it certainly isn't the other player's fault and the player has a right to complain. Competition is supposed to be fair and if one player cannot show up in fair conditions then maybe he shouldn't play.
this is offtopic and pretty egoistic
!
why more and more people show just behavior for own advantage?
and no! dont expect that i will take a leaf front my moth, many of u are Hypocrite.
Wtf with this thread. There has been packetloss and ping probs since the first online game and i can't really recall any single gaming community that would have a universal rule about what amount of loss is acceptable.
There has been, there are, and there will be players who for various reasons cannot have good connection. Live with that. Ultimately, it's up to the clan leaders, and the player himself, to decide wether he can play or not.
first time i agree with mad on a strict post!
We still play for fun...don't we ?
We still play for fun...don't we ?
this is the basic Q what i have, but i love to listen myself, thx mona to bring it up clearly
The whole point is that some players have an unfair advantage, whether they want it or not. And btw someone said before that it is up to the clanleaders to decide before a cw (ie. no rule for it).
@Mow - Egoistic.. q3 is egoistic. I think that it's pretty simple that you want to win yourself
If I am to lose just because someone has an unfair advantage (doesnt matter it he wants it or not), something isn't right. Ofc it isnt the players fault, but if he/she is jumping from one position to the next without movement in between and I cant hit them I dont think it's my fault and I should pay for it by losing.