Ranking discussion

33 replies [Last post]
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Ranking discussion
.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN! wrote:


Dunno but ranking would be done best with auto ranking website and all rule propositions and inter-clan disputes handled by voting.

cool, and who will check for rank violations? by voting? if u let everyone vote u gonna have time issues and people got multiple ip.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN!
ShadyAK's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
GB United Kingdom
Ranking discussion

Oh and i realisied there was more written here Thumbs down

well being a mod is about being neutral and non-subjective. Thats why for example i am not mod. Cos i see issue from my side and deep in sub-consciousness i acknowledge it but openly keep going in my line. (btw just for record, auto ranking is not my concept, im not in charge, i just submit ideas and try to find ppl and after all steps necessary in it are taken i will not be involved)
but hey, all im saying is skull is not entirely objective either. 6 months addition for being unreliable? Come on. And even though killer doesnt care, the fact they care so much makes me care Chatterbox
all i want to do is get killer unbanned and help the auto ranking start but with new mod both might not be needed. OBAMAAAA !!!CHAAAAANGE!!!! PLUS IT HAS A THAWING BAR !!!!!

[+]

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
nonsense repellent declamatory

.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN!
ShadyAK's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
GB United Kingdom
Ranking discussion
rUnThEoN?! wrote:

.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN! wrote:

Dunno but ranking would be done best with auto ranking website and all rule propositions and inter-clan disputes handled by voting.

cool, and who will check for rank violations? by voting? if u let everyone vote u gonna have time issues and people got multiple ip.

simplify ranking rules and there will be less "violations"... A neutral referee is all that is needed to make sure pb + pure is on. Other sort of disputes happen very rarely. And only clans will be registered to the ranking, not people.. Clan leader can choose to share info with other people or post everything themselves. There will also be a hall of fame and option to challenge other clans through the website.

[+]

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
nonsense repellent declamatory

rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Ranking discussion
.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN! wrote:


but hey, all im saying is skull is not entirely objective either. 6 months addition for being unreliable? Come on.

i got something to do too boy, i cant listen to killer trying to get unbanned everyday.
and this clanleader thingy failed 1.5 years ago.
and that refs arent trustable all the time shows cpma community.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN!
ShadyAK's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
GB United Kingdom
Ranking discussion

Well if you have better stuff to do than general duties related to your position (btw why does it take like a month for each clan war to get an R symbol there days? Its not like there is massive in flow of those) then you shouldnt be in that position should ya?

[+]

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
nonsense repellent declamatory

madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
Ranking discussion

First of all, there should be a clear division of duties. One person, at the very least someone who is not known for open biases and side-taking, should handle ranking violations etc, be the 'face' of the ranking, so to speak. Maybe several people at that, coming from different breeding grounds. Others would do the technical stuff. You can't have someone completely bias-clean and a member of this community at the same time, but the combo we had now was way too obvious, and the examples of Mirc and Skinnis have shown people from around here can be impartial.

The truth is, guilty or not, judgement calls made on likes and dislikes were what brought us to the current situation, and that is the fault of one, and one person only, with the other being an idle supporter and community 'serving' as anvil and hammer.

Clear your eyes from all the shit and see the things for what they are.

Oh, and Mow, there is a difference between what happened to me, and what happened now. I wasn't crucified for making biased decisions, i was crucified for making any decisions at all. Therein lies the key to the gate.

mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Ranking discussion

Well, it was anyway the almost same group of people. Which reason ever...

also a funny fact is, ina left the mod-team, before this thread was created. so some extra-reputation damage is planned, obviosly Happy

voodoo
Offline
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts:
Ranking discussion
UnknownUser807 wrote:

This is how it should roll

- Rena as "Head Ranking Admin"
- Secret (e5) "Ranking Moderator"
- "Someone else (plus) "Ranking Moderator"
- Skinnis/Mircwar and Spider as "Head Moderators"

Remove Foksie/Ina from power. fuck you and have a nice day

Thx god u didnt proposed urself for any of those functions couse u would be much much worse mod than skullina.

.DA|BEAST.
Beast_Cro's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts:
Ranking discussion
mow Q [EN] wrote:

Of course there are reasons to be dissatisfied with ina and skull, but not with their work, but much more there kind of communication.

I would say with their work too (there were enough "recorded" mistakes made by them), but the type of communication is HUGE problem (degrades the work they do so its related)...thats what U get when U have 1 gang in control. This is where all problems began (for DA's at least)

UnknownUser807 wrote:

This is how it should roll

- Rena as "Head Ranking Admin"
- Secret (e5) "Ranking Moderator"
- "Someone else (plus) "Ranking Moderator"
- Skinnis/Mircwar and Spider as "Head Moderators"

Remove Foksie/Ina from power. fuck you and have a nice day

Hm, would be a step forward thats for sure! So F1.

Foksie is trying to be neutral but when U R pussy-whipped by a control arrogant freak then there is only so much one male (who have needs) can resist. (even had to change some rules influencing many others here cuz of his "darling" said so - proof enough, one of many)

Dunno what ppl thought in the first place would happen when they appointed someone like Ina and servants to be in charge of anything...

Oh yes, last thing I always wanted to return to someone since its sign is offending everyone in almost every topic:

Sug min kurac (you know who you are).

Cheers,

Beast

The chase is better than the catch!

.DA| Clan | CRO Team

Beer freezer server map rotation + download links:
http://www.excessiveplus.net/forums/thread/beer-freezer-rotation

UnknownUser807
Reno's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts:
Ranking discussion
voodoo wrote:

UnknownUser807 wrote:
This is how it should roll

- Rena as "Head Ranking Admin"
- Secret (e5) "Ranking Moderator"
- "Someone else (plus) "Ranking Moderator"
- Skinnis/Mircwar and Spider as "Head Moderators"

Remove Foksie/Ina from power. fuck you and have a nice day

Thx god u didnt proposed urself for any of those functions couse u would be much much worse mod than skullina.

F1

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin