Ineed my friend .. i inivite u all guys to watch those videos

wrote:

im just getting this spinning feeling in my head

Stop using drugs man!

Over the years, I have gained interest in 911 myself. I watched a many of documentaries.

The 2 North & South WTC Towers are built on a 'truss' network. Back in the 70's it was coated with fire protect. When the plane entered, the trusses were blown away in the impact zone, but left the inner core of the building free. As the heat began to melt away at the metal, the trusses would fall down onto one another, until there was soo much pressure on the core and heat, it collapsed inwards. Its a common theory for building collapses that were built in the 70's.

The small WTC building at the bottom: It collapsed hours afterwards the main North & South Towers. Are you drunk? Earthquakes weaken and can destroy buildings.

Now for the 'Missile Deployment / External Fuel Tank' attached at the bottom of the Boeing 757...
I myself am a pilot for QANTAS Airways in Australia, and being a Captain of an aircraft, I can tell you this: No external masses can be added to a bottom of an aircraft without being noticable. Here are the reasons:

-We have certain checks by Maintenence Staff Before the plane is in service each day, prior to takeoff and it is my role/duty to check the plane before Boarding (Captain's Check).

-ATC Check -> Visual
-Other Aircraft -> Visual

Not only would it be seen, but there are the forces of lift and drag which come into the ratio. I don't think you understand, but sometimes when you get on a plane, they block out seats in random positions of the aircraft? This is not just because of last minute booking, but because of Weight issues to do with lift. Having an exterior mass underneath an aircraft would be quite noticeable, even when taxiing.
On Take-Off, V1 & V2 Rotate Checks would differ than from on the instruments, and External Weight would show up on ECAS Panels in the cockpit.
EVERYTHING is relayed back to ATC, Instrument data, the lot. Even ATC would pick something abnormal let alone us!!! It is practically impossible to somehow attach something like that on an aircraft, unless you boycot all the aircraft on the apron, the Pilots and the ATC personnell in the tower. Its just not practical.

Now Correction: The 757 that crashed into the WTC is equipped with RR (Rolls Royce) Engines, which take only a mixture of JET FUEL. Cerosin or whatever shit you are talking about can't be injected into these babies for christ's sake.

Now for your theory on 'Burning away at the metal' & on Impact
When more oxygen is allowed into an RR Engine, (As you all know with typical engines) the Output is more greater, and temps go up ^. If you noticed, by hearing or seeing the planes just before impact, they increased the throttle of the aircraft. Increasing the throttle = more heat of the engines.
When the plane hit, if you notice the front end of the Fueslage plummets into the building first, followed by the Leading edge of the wing AND the 2 RR Engines. When something flies into an RR Engine, it will either shutdown or catch alight. But when it goes through a wall of metal, its going to blow up man WHILE running at 100% Throttle. You see that Cloud of Fire? This happens BEFORE the WHOLE aircraft is out of sight and is in the building. The ball of fire occurs when there is a ton of heat from a Jet Engine that blows up with 100% Throttle.

I hope this gives you a clear and factual understanding as to how inhumanely possible that it is for such circumstances to exist.

Actualy a colapso of so many materials is a really big earthquake. It cant be felt far, since it is on the surface, but arround the centre (the two wtc towers) the shaking of ground was massive. So that could have been enough, especialy if the builders of the wtc decided to save some money on materials. (that happenes a lot you know, the bad construction due to corruption and profit making).