asking for a ban
hi. i'm kindly asking for this person to get a ban from beer.freezer: doubletap (aka ligas) for spamming with insulting private messages during game.
won't translate it myself, since i'm one of the interested parties here. ask someone else. demo available.
ligas, if you've been sexually molested when you were a child (Mip Mip) and now you need help of a qualified psychiatrist, then just go and get it. stop sitting daily on beer freezer and projecting yourself to ppl that own you in game, please. it won't help you.
dunno, where attached screenies gone, uploaded to radikal, here they are:
I asked you two questions in private.
So I see no reason for ban.
Den witness. He saw that all was well.
You just hate me ilca...It's your personal problems
I asked the administrator DEN "Can I use private chat?"
DEN Said: Yes,just do not spam in the game.
My Mip Mip you do not like u? Pffff It's your personal problems
Ban Ligas.
Ban Ligas.
Blade said:"DRINA PEDERCINA"
Ps.Nothing personal..
ekhem.. so ban you and blade?
ekhem.. so ban you and blade?
Ofc no.Blade good man.I respected him.He is always right
Double Tap was unbanned because the proof was not clear enough that he is ligas.
So he is ligas? If yes (I need a proof) i will reinstall q3 again just to ban him.
Double Tap was unbanned because the proof was not clear enough that he is ligas.
So he is ligas? If yes (I need a proof) i will reinstall q3 again just to ban him.
LOVE YOUR WILLING TO SACRAFICE, MOW
proof is in cheaters report discussion
---------------------------
ALONE * DOUBLE TAP 10.06.2011 8:43
and again I cheat
---------------------------
ALONE * DOUBLE TAP 10.06.2011 15:48
I have there or doubletap
---------------------------
SHADOW 10.06.2011 15:48
mm
---------------------------
ALONE * DOUBLE TAP 10.06.2011 15:48
ili ligastaev
---------------------------
ALONE * DOUBLE TAP 10.06.2011 15:48
ili TAPDOUBLE
---------------------------
mm, but there are two proofs in log.
1. zerobd is pusik.
2. doubletap is ligas. He told to Shadow his account on QL - ligastaev, but was wrong and type his real account later.
mow, weren't it you who said then, 'the evidence from e+ spy is clear enough'?
anyway, look @cheaters report discussion.
Dunno, and i am to lazy to check if i said that, but i can say that joy convinced me that the proof we had at this time were not save enough + double tap begging millions of pm's to mona to unban.
(can't imagine i ever used a term like e+spy).
Well, this seems to be a proof and he weren't denieing here as soon as he could have done it.
mow, weren't it you who said then, 'the evidence from e+ spy is clear enough'?
anyway, look @cheaters report discussion.