k just thought id add my 2 cents. why pb + pure? it just adds that additional sense of assurance, of standardization. the idea is that if u play ranked cws with pb and pure (and with a referee since thats being talked about too), u have the assurance that all the ranked clan wars are being played in circumstances that are officially recognized and moderated. and in the e+ community (be it bro or e5) thats quite important considering the relative prevalance of cheating. this isnt to say hey lots of e5 players are cheaters. not sure about the statistics but i would think there are as many cheaters in the bro community as there are in the e5 one. its just a safeguard against the whole thing so u can say we've done everything we can to stop this from happening.

k there. i think pretty much everybody knew that. . but imo this discussion shouldnt really be about "why use pb+pure in cws?". it should be about "WHY NOT?!".

for all the talk in here and in the thread that was split, i havent seen anybody give a single good reason why this rule is unnecassary. not to sound rude or anything, but if u dont personally have a problem with playing pb and pure 1, then why oppose this rule? just what exactly is the harm in enforcing it?

f1 pure and pb for ED as everybody knows.

More than 1 year after bro community lol. Anyway, always some ppl to be against rules evolution, nobody can change that

rmb wants to play with pb and pure and is allowed to force tnc to play with that.
isnt ur opinion about forcing pure and pb and the difference between bro and e5 a bit lacking?
sure, forcing always pb and pure isnt same like in bro, but if both clans want to play without, no1 can stop them.

edit:

wrote:

This is how it should work imo. Forcing people will always have negative aspects, even in real life. Pushing people a bit, is way more helpfull.

Greets

pushing and forcing = the same in ur case