FreeZe Summer Cup '2008 !!
june just started lol.
It did, but 2007 was for six months ago.
If during a match a clan loses players that it goes below the required 4 player minimum, and they can't find a replacement, for which they have their timeouts, the match is a WO
why not allow the clan to finish the game 3vs4? just an idea ;p
Nice idea F1 for 3v4 if 1 ppl missed during the game
:DEVA*eXtReMe: wrote:If during a match a clan loses players that it goes below the required 4 player minimum, and they can't find a replacement, for which they have their timeouts, the match is a WOwhy not allow the clan to finish the game 3vs4? just an idea ;p
F1 , couse happens could be many : lags ; net crash etc. and many times other members are offline by the real life trouble
If in one team four players went out, so match is being played 4v0, yes? Good luck
wrote:
why not allow the clan to finish the game 3vs4? just an idea ;pthat is unfair , all matches must be finish 4v4.
pfff, we would be kicking any clans arse with only 3 players
nah, jk..
i think its a good idea... somebody's net crashes due to a thunderstorm or something and is not able to be back within 2 minutes, but he returns after (lets say) 6-7 minutes... the clan could play 3v4 then and 4v4 again when the guy is back. IMO that's fairer than the other way round...
OR:
its 1-0, the winning team loses 1 player on the second map... if they finish 3v4 and lose the second map, it would be 1-1 and if the missing player returns to the third map, they still have a chance to win.
and further the clan would use both the timeouts in a row, which would cause a looooooot of unsatisfaction during the cw (and might start flame-wars ).
+ more thrill
TnT in
What you mean? ; >
"Only God Can Judge Me"