how about this.

24 replies [Last post]
*[UO]*OSKALIBER'
Oskaliber's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
how about this.

Awww, Mad what did you do with second topic? We didn't get answer Sad


>> Undead Order Clan Site & Forum <<

# Razer Diamondback # SteelPad QcK # Philips SHP2500 # Flatron F700B

sabo
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
congrats :D
psy.co wrote:

Guard may not sleep during the night Cool ...

Yes thats right!i have no prize for u Sad.actualy hes not alowed to sleep during his shift...i mean if his shift was at day...he could sleep at night...

madbringer wrote:

Sabotage, you shouldn't create two different topics about riddles, one would be enough. Even better, you should just post it in Warnerman's thread.

I'm sorry i dont post that often. didn't know Winking

AoQ | SIMPS
Simpson's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts:
how about this.

he needed warmup

Phenom II X2 550 BE @ X4 @ 4x3.1Ghz 1.35v (Unlocked to Quad)
4GB DDR2 800 CL4
Sapphire HD6850 @930/1150Mhz

torzelan.com
TorZelan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
how about this.
AoQ | SIMPS wrote:

he needed warmup

I lol'd for real Big grin

.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN!
ShadyAK's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
GB United Kingdom
how about this.

That's called "laughing"... the Oxford dictionary describes "laughing" as a lighter form of the now infamous "lol", the main difference being that the "laugh" can take place in non-electronic form Tongue

madbringer wrote:

Sabotage, you shouldn't create two different topics about riddles, one would be enough. Even better, you should just post it in Warnerman's thread.

But... like, they're totally different riddles, and they both need to different logical buildups, which need input from all the participating members... and by mixing the 2 riddles, the shit gets all mixed up...

Note also, how this and the 3rd riddle have nothing to do with either Einstein or Warnerman, so its not related to the original htread...

Opening statement closed your honour, bring on the Defence :twisted:

[+]

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
nonsense repellent declamatory

x.foksie'loy.drt?
foksie's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
how about this.

since you updated the post that "the king dies if the guard goes"

its quite obvious...

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

torzelan.com
TorZelan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
how about this.
.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN! wrote:

That's called "laughing"... the Oxford dictionary describes "laughing" as a lighter form of the now infamous "lol", the main difference being that the "laugh" can take place in non-electronic form Tongue

I think to Laugh Out Loud is kind of non-electronic.

I guess I'm just the last idiot in the world actually using lol in its original form and even crazier, not in the most inappropriate situations ever (such as every single time some one writes "lol ;P" and with that reverses the universe).

lol ffs Sad
Because "Laughing out loud for fucks sake with a sad face" makes total sense!

P.S. I admit to writing "lol'd" where "laughing out loud" was grammatically incorrect, just as the save "laughed out loud" was ruined by the "'d", but writing "I lol for real" would sound like I was still doing it (where it wasn't THAT funny) and I saw no better option at the time. And I really wanted to include a "lol" for once.
This is all really important. That's why this text is so large.

.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN!
ShadyAK's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
GB United Kingdom
how about this.

I havent made sense since 1997, so i totally understand Happy

I remember i was talking to a friend back in school (my first year of A-levels, which kind of means t'was 2-3 years ago)... anyhoo, we were talkin bout this whole "intenet/ msn speak"... and i said smthn like "i hate all those "lol ROTFML l333t" expressions and such (cos i used to hate them back then ... lol rotfml (the extra m is for "ketchup")), and he says: "yeah, cos you know they aren't laughing when they write it"

If you're looking for a point to this post, there wasnt any, i thought i'd just share this useful point with the world, so it contributes to the whole "world peace" project i heard so much about...

Oh yeah, i also promised myself if actually use "LOL" in a conversation, i am punching my self in the face straight away, with my "big boy" punch too... would look vaguely amusing to whoever im speaking to Tongue, but there's no excuse Big grin

[+]

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
nonsense repellent declamatory

torzelan.com
TorZelan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
how about this.

Yeah I'm normally not a nitpicker on stuff like that (regardless of what I actually think) but it just annoys the shit out of me when some one types "lol ;P" and means pretty much the exact opposite of what lol is short for. Not even that alone is what annoys me, but the fact that that rookie probably has no idea what he's talking about or what kind of situation a "lol" would fit in.

Was hilarious when I heard some people were failing badly at our school (6-7 years back then, geez time flies :'( ) in Swedish classes because they were including "lol" and stuff in their essays... Big grin

Anyway, dunno if we should apologize for going this massively off topic but the answer has already been given and all Love struck

madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
how about this.
.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN! wrote:

But... like, they're totally different riddles, and they both need to different logical buildups

Stop right there, chum. There is a quote system. If people would be actually using that, one thread would be more then adequate.

Nah, i see two or three or whatever-the-fuck threads with very similar content, i throw every not needed to the trash. How do i choose which one?

Two other things -

1. Ain't a subject for discussion.

2. Sabotage, don't doublepost.