InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016

101 replies [Last post]
24. April 2016 - 7:19
#11
echooo ^
echo's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016

never mind.

Top
24. April 2016 - 9:07
#12
eu.jeff
jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016
Loxotron wrote:

3v3 helps to avoid the w/o's but ye i can agree that 4v4 is much more fun. Would actually go with 4v4 and in rare cases when both clans agree could be 3v3 exceptions, when clan cant gather the 4 anyhow.

I agree, but only if there is no other way for playing the clanwar

Top
24. April 2016 - 14:57
#13
DR*DIABLO
EL-D1ABL0's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016

*WOOF* in

Top
24. April 2016 - 15:41
#14
(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT)
Site administrator
haxxus's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts:
US United States
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016

-> F1

Top
24. April 2016 - 22:00
#15
p1atinum
Offline
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016
(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:

-> F1

btw, some members of your clan are already in other railonly clans Thinking

boo

Top
24. April 2016 - 22:05
#16
p1atinum
Offline
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016
eu.jeff wrote:

Loxotron wrote:
3v3 helps to avoid the w/o's but ye i can agree that 4v4 is much more fun. Would actually go with 4v4 and in rare cases when both clans agree could be 3v3 exceptions, when clan cant gather the 4 anyhow.

I agree, but only if there is no other way for playing the clanwar

We can make minimum 4vs4, for us personally it's okay, I don't think we'll have trouble in Intel gathering 4 players, now that some old members got back and some new joined. I just thought it would be better for some other less active clans. However, if nobody has any problems with gathering 4 players for a game once a week, then for sure we can make a minimum of 4vs4.

boo

Top
25. April 2016 - 3:17
#17
(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT)
Site administrator
haxxus's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts:
US United States
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016
p1atinum wrote:

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
-> F1

btw, some members of your clan are already in other railonly clans Thinking

the ones who are will not play the cup or will post on clan threat if they will .

F1 on 4vs4 minimum

Top
25. April 2016 - 10:23
#18
DR*DIABLO
EL-D1ABL0's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016
p1atinum wrote:

eu.jeff wrote:
Loxotron wrote:
3v3 helps to avoid the w/o's but ye i can agree that 4v4 is much more fun. Would actually go with 4v4 and in rare cases when both clans agree could be 3v3 exceptions, when clan cant gather the 4 anyhow.

I agree, but only if there is no other way for playing the clanwar

We can make minimum 4vs4, for us personally it's okay, I don't think we'll have trouble in Intel gathering 4 players, now that some old members got back and some new joined. I just thought it would be better for some other less active clans. However, if nobody has any problems with gathering 4 players for a game once a week, then for sure we can make a minimum of 4vs4.

as said on earlier posts...we gonna have issues with polak clans...look my clandb aswell, its nice to make 4v4 or 5v5 and its actually also gonna be like this ofc, but putting a rule of 4v4 min, can be problematic in my opinion..F2

Top
25. April 2016 - 14:38
#19
echooo ^
echo's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016

i think 4v4 is more interesting, we could try this hardcore Happy but for some clans it might be a problem, so i think obligatory 4 as minimum will make this tournament nightmare for them Winking i would do 4v4 as a minimum to validate the game but let to play 3v3 if there is no other way.
edit:but it might be a nonsens, because clans will play it 3v3 anyway arguing there is no other way out (even if they could find 4th player, but they will not for some reason) so all in all rule should be: 4 players minimum to valid the game. Nerd

Top
25. April 2016 - 18:18
#20
RIX!·SOUL·
Joinz's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
Re: InstaGib Freeze Tag League 2016
eu.jeff wrote:

Loxotron wrote:
3v3 helps to avoid the w/o's but ye i can agree that 4v4 is much more fun. Would actually go with 4v4 and in rare cases when both clans agree could be 3v3 exceptions, when clan cant gather the 4 anyhow.

I agree, but only if there is no other way for playing the clanwar

kinda what i tried to say but in better wording Happy f1

Top