Democracy
rocks :!: How much is important old democratic systems dont realy know, they forget :!: But ex comunists countries know verry well :!: fresh memory :!: So, I responde emidiate. Please feel free to express yourself here. I will apriciate verry well to participate mostly clan leaders, or coleaders :!: If they absent, then somone from clan can represent it. All good propousals are wellcome :!: Personaly I like verry well Bodz suggestion :!: After constructive discusion we will make some form and be smarter then now. Next step is voting :!:
Best regards

yeah i agree ratz put a poll about this i write something simple
When you play mixed wars only :

You must play 2 maps minimum in each gametype to rank your war in the specific gametype rankboard.

If 1 map is won for each clan in a specific gametype, the match will be ranked as DRAW in the specific rankboard and so on.

Under 2 maps per gametypes, the war won't be ranked in the specific gametype but only in the total rank board.

Example :

Clan A play against Clan B a mix war : 2maps ctf, 2maps tdm, 2maps tag.
Clan A won 1map in TDM, 1map in TAG and won 2 map in ctf :

Clan A will get draw in tdm and tag specific rankboards, and win in ctf and total rankboard.

The best imo is to add/forsee a tie map before wars in case of both team won a map to not have too much draw for specific gametypes.

time for digression....lol

hmm i dont know what exactly the epuc idea is but if its about ranking the games in different gametypes in a cw separately then it does make sense to me...i mean if u play 4 tdm games drawn 2 - 2 and win on a freeze tag game then it kinda makes sense that u win the match in total rank and freeze rank and u draw the match in tdm....

BUT...to be completely honest does it really matter that much? perhaps...if we are gonna be really particular about ranking (which we mite as well be cos theres no good reason for not being particular and there are some reasons important or not for being particular)....then it makes sense not to rank different gametypes together given the fact that rena has a different ranking for each gametype and total one....

however if ur gonna ask clans to play 3 games of each gametype in a single cw...uve gotta be crazy...lol 5 games a cw is fair enough....6(which is even and therefore unacceptable to me) or 9 is way too many....but thats just me....

btw i have a feeling that if u start incorporating epuc into the skills and points stuff in ranking its gonna get real messy

btw rena im kinda confused about the skills and points in cw ranking....err u say that the points u earn per game is dependant on difference in existing points multiplied by efficiency etc...this is done so that when u play a tougher team u gain more points..thats the basic idea right?...but how do u calculate skill? now im thinking this confusion is because the ranking rules didnt come across to me...could you either explain to me in this thready precisely how u calculate points and skill....or just modify the ranking rules thread to include how u calculate skills plsssssss? (btw im notoriously bad with different definitions...u mite have meant one thing and i wouldve taken it to mean something completely different..that is a possibility...sorry in advance if thats the case)

ok rena i went through that rules topic more carefully....

got a few questions...the way u award more points if the team u beat has more or less points than u before the war is so that if u beat a team thats far above u in points u get more points right?

but i dont understand..now uve already made sure that u get more points by beating a tougher team...but y then do wish to compound this effect by multiplying the points by the efficiency of ur opponent..by doing this ur doing the same thing twice isnt it? strictly speaking the multiplication by opponent efficiency is not all that necassary...

and then for skill u miltiply the points u gain by ur own efficiency...isnt this simply a way in which better teams get more skill points for the same game that a lower ranked team in terms of points would get less points...kinda like the richer getting richer and the poor getting poorer...to me it makes no sense to multiply points by ur own efficiency because ur current skill level should have no effect upon the skill points u earn by playing a team...its only their skill level that should matter in the skill points u gain in a cw...

atleast this is what i think...perhaps im making a mistake in my reasoning..