Netsettings with explanations:
Very nice info, thanx for bringing it in and sharing it with us, mow.
Btw, can this be stickied?
wrote:nice work mownot my work, if u read carefully the beginning.
that's a good work, very easy to understand. Now maybe i should teach you how to present a source in an academic way
wrote:it should be cl_packetdup, not cl_packetdub.lol ? nobody said anything else ... cmd is cl_packetdup (think for packet-duplication)
btw got it for signature
rofl man, there was a typo in the text Mow posted..
mad is right and base has made a bite in his own balls.
all happy now?
Best quote
good job mow :thumbright:
q3 dosent act exacly as that but it is realy usful stuf
if u will experiment a bit with internet q3 values and u measue badwich wich they are taking u quickly notice it make jumps and betwen these jumps are totaly none of changes
cl_maxpackets
30(1.9kb/s), 40(2.3kb/s), 58(3.2kb/s), 111(4.5kb/s), 125(9kb/s)
its yors upstream badwich taken, note that below these values it still will be taking exacly the same amount of badwich
i am also belive syncing snaps to these numbers or with packets in ratio 1/1 1/2 or 1/3 gives good results
also after talking with nihil about cl_timenudget im convinced using negative value may but not must make u harder to hit, lagging guy using negative value in mine eyes will be harder to hit, it means that nudge inself will not make u laggy but if u r laggy or have pack loss it will elevate that more
lol rly u guys are all stoned or blind ? ... he has written 2 times the same thats the reason i quoted this ...
cl_packetduP
cl_packetduB
how is it the same?
cl_packetduP
cl_packetduBhow is it the same?
omg ok then iam stoned :oops:
cl_packetduP
cl_packetduBhow is it the same?
maybe it was a kind of an eye bug.
u know 1337 eye bug?
read:
Silmies lkie criyng or vrey sad are situpd
slitl u can raed eevry tnihg as lnog as the frist and the lsat lteetrs are the smae.
:>>