:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

80 replies [Last post]
14. November 2005 - 7:59
#11
(HK)Spider
spider's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

Nice deex Happy in the forum says 13 year Or OLDER... 13 year 13 yearrr.. they dont have the same judgement view like 20's Happy

So i stand for this ...

Quote:
.: | h3ktor dice:
XD
phail ;_;

Visit: http://www.excessiveplus.net/spider/

Top
14. November 2005 - 18:38
#12
2005 Strutter
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

has no one ever seen 12 year olds giggle at porn? its what you see at school, its not bad for em..

Top
14. November 2005 - 19:47
#13
nw
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

porn is bad. what more?

trance's avator was nice ..)

David Byrne wrote:

the wind in my heart
the dust in my head..

Top
14. November 2005 - 21:32
#14
.
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

Trances avatar was FAR from porn.And I vote that he gets it back Winking

Top
15. November 2005 - 3:50
#15
FIREFOX
FIREFOX's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

DX
Thanks for the regulation, you are right. Kids will and do look at the forums. For some kids it might not be a issue for them, but other kids it might be.
I myself, Do find it offensive, or should I say...inapropriate. Erotic or partially nude pictures are not for a game forum. If people want that sort of thing there is the internet to search.....not Q3 FORUMS Love struck
Regards Happy

Top
15. November 2005 - 3:53
#16
DARK
DARKLORD's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

yeah much in agreement with deex on this GG deex

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Top
15. November 2005 - 7:12
#17
*SHORT.SWE*
Offline
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

trance should have his avatar back. As Wax said MTV is 9000 times worse.
Which makes this rule kinda pointless.

And as also mentioned, kids find porn if they want, its not like they would raise their eyebrows for the avatars we use here. I understand that ppl has kids that plays or watches their parents play, but then they dont follow the 18+ rule, but i understand, that woulndt work either.

I just think the "not showing skin -attitude is a bit weird. One thing if your offended FF, but if u say this is a game forum and therefore u think f.e that trance old avatar was bad, then there must be some rule that says that every avatar is connected to q3.

Is my avatar ok ? i bet the children love my one.

Is my signature ok ? i bet the children love my signature

is trance pre-avatar ok ? i know that almost everyone prays that he gets it back.

All the marijuana-avatars are ok ?

Q3 contains violence, im offended by violence. <-- then u would say what are u doing in this forum?

My answer would be:
Is not ok for a children to watch a girl dance, but its ok to gib big guys with rail so blood get all over the walls ?

conclusion: Violence and Drugs = totally ok; " FRAG ON HAPPY PPL!" nothing wrong with having some fun aint it

girls dancing without nuclear-proof-suit = NOT OK, I CAN SEE SKIN, ITS BAD FOR ME AND MY KIDS

Top
15. November 2005 - 7:54
#18
term+
Site administrator
term's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

Short mate, you have a point there Cool

ExcessivePlus Administrator

Top
15. November 2005 - 12:16
#19
EVOL.IZNOGOUD
Iznogoud's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

Of my kids there is only one that might browse this forum once in a while and he is capable of finding whatever nudity he wants on the net anyways and he for sure wont be satisfied what comes to nudity by those avatars used so far.
I'm more concerned about him trying them recipies of explosives out that can be found elswere on the net...

Has Trance's old avatar been an issue here? Really?

Bättre pissa i stuprännan än stupa i pissrännan !

Top
15. November 2005 - 14:30
#20
{SGR}*KNIGHTNES*
knightnes's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts:
:!: **NO OFFENSIVE POSTS/PORN ETC** :!:

ok, i dont understand anything here..if mtv has a lot of nude girls in their programs it justifies that we can have porn avatars or porn posts or whatever?..jumm..i dont think so..it is like to say..well i see a lot of people robbering banks in the news every day so im going to steal in the supermarket next to my house..the other people is doing a worse thing than me sooo....it is justificable..my god..if it is the defense u guys use to justify all that kind of shit...jummm..it leaves a lot to think

Top