:RANK COMMENTS:

101 replies [Last post]
4. December 2010 - 13:14
#11
HYPER'DRAGON
Dragon.'s picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:
eRRor369 wrote:

agree with Kicek

f1

http://i.minus.com/ibr3JCojpWyue4.gif

Kai Greene: " Oouuuhh "

Top
4. December 2010 - 13:29
#12
JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

and thats why no1 of u 3 are ranking moderators, because all punishments should take a power with taking into account the identity of the offender.

Top
4. December 2010 - 13:31
#13
eRRor369
eRRor369's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

i'm not modelator, cuz i don't want to be. Tongue

pew pew you're dead

Top
4. December 2010 - 13:37
#14
JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

Im not also a director of the exxton mobile , because I dont want to be, theres other question - could you be a great rank mod while u have such opinions?

Top
4. December 2010 - 21:48
#15
3M'darkangel
darkangelspa's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

Added two new rules:

-demos
-lag problems

Also modificated the information about:

''HOW TO POST MATCH SCORES?''

More info here:

http://www.excessiveplus.net/forums/thread/ranking-rules-0


Gloria Mōmentum
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”



“There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter.”
—Ernest Hemingway

Top
4. December 2010 - 22:26
#16
^t
smasherchif's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:
3M'darkangel wrote:

- if the second clan, dont want to play the cw, but the first clan want to play it, then they should play it.

they should play with lagger or what? or they just can't refuse to play anyway and if they haven't enough players without lags they can't continue or what? in this situation - what's next?
what maximum difference of ping is allowed? what maximum packet loss? constant or occasional?

3M'darkangel wrote:
- if the first clan dont agree to play vs second clan with lagly player, they must change the dates/time of cw.

can this be abused?

imo, you don't know what you're doing.


.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN! wrote:
Fuck! I just thought of the most awesome pun about the BC vs Smurfs final game and the flames that followed :
"In Soviet Moldavia, Pole rages YOU"
like 2 months after Call me

3M'darkangel wrote:
// 09:30:49 27.06.2010, UNKNOWN LOCATION,
Name { "Biotoxin" }
IP { "localhost" }

SHUDDER wrote:
People are training hard to hide their autoshoot so well while gain enough skills to win (or at least compete on similar level) without them. This is getting insane or provoked. I feel like I would cut myself with Ockham's Razor if I claim a cheat there.

Top
4. December 2010 - 22:37
#17
epsiplayer
THE ONE AND ONLY
intact-epsilon's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

what it means to have lag?

how can we measure if a player have lags or not? i mean what are the normality limits of "the lag"?
when does a clan become "laggy" ?

if a player gets 100% loss packets/999 ping is that conssiderd laggy ? could he try to reconnect while the game is timeouted or is all lost?

what if both clans become "laggy" ? how will the rules obey .. including this1 :
"- if the second clan, dont want to play the cw, but the first clan want to play it, then they should play it."

i dont agree with the forced posponed because of the laggyness .. what can you do at 3v3 else then try another date ?? just like illca said please watch those rules to not be easily abused ..

i think all those rules about clans to become laggy are for 3v3

___________
epsislow


Top
4. December 2010 - 22:40
#18
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

please, do not try to make something pro out of e+, keep it simple, thanks!

Top
5. December 2010 - 0:20
#19
[MR.]RIDDLER
Offline
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

From other thread:

[MR.]RIDDLER wrote:
mow Q [EN] wrote:
anyway, it means, if u have nobody of making a mvd u can't play a CW.

it is more a backstep than an improvement.

+1. Nothing wrong with the old system - if both sides agree to have pb off, no ref and no demos, RANK! Any post-war flames? Its the clans fault for not paying enough attention, end of.

Btw, who are the ranking moderators these days? Is it just Darkangel and Blackrose or is there anyone else in the fray too?

Top
5. December 2010 - 0:35
#20
3M'darkangel
darkangelspa's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

i think i said clearly in what consist the lag, if the ping jumps from 20 and hight with packets loss...and the player is ''telepporting in the map'' then this rule will work.
also if both clasn agree they can play it : )
but im getting tired cos in many cw or even fw...peopel complain about omg u lager...
ok we played today vs lagers...etc etc...
but ok so here are the ''limits'' what lager means:

starting from 150ping
starting from 10%packet loss


Gloria Mōmentum
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”



“There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter.”
—Ernest Hemingway

Top