quote Kid "Train vs Noobs and with unbalanced teams: thats really hard?"

Kid i belive you can be a much better player even if you play vs noobs. Unbind your binds and concentrate .You are always spamming with binds and tell people what team to join. Train moves,weapon change and other things and you will be better.

this isn't an argument at all, this is just you whining blindly about something that doesn't need to be made a big deal. The 'war' servers that DO have a rank are usually trained on and afked on a lot, at least when I played. So THOSE stats are irrelevant too. The rank means NOTHING from a public server to a war server, two different mindsets of playing. People tend to talk and sit there and tinker a lot in public servers (so why should rank matter?) I do not know why the top 10 is bothering you so much. I guess I will make a post complaining why there isn't a last 10 and a middle 10. I will also complain about noobs playing the 'pros' as you had made a post about pros playing noobs. I didn't know servers had skill requirements. I am not against you as a person but, what is the point to this thread? Does it really bother you that you see a top 10 generated from a list of criteria that does not evaluate skill in a remotely equally fair way? Some people play quake just to play quake, good and bad players come on at ALL times of the day; it just so happens some times the 'good players' get bored after a while and quit and there might be one really good player who still wanted to play while all the others left, and the rest of the players aren't so good. So he killed someone who wasn't so good a few times so what?

I don't think you have a problem with the rank, but more of the constant in-game top 10 right (Because you can easily avoid the online stats by not going to the site)? Ignore it, just like you would ignore someone on the server. If it doesn't isn't something you like, don't concern yourself about it. Now if naked pictures were popping up in the console and you truly did oppose that, I could see a problem with that. But it's non-offensive text generated by a weak script.

Of course, it would be nice to have a global rank that would rightfully 'rank' players and weight points by rank, etc etc (a more intense criteria) but do you know how hard and long it would take to make one effective enough? Do you know how many things you would break and have to fix in attempt to make a more general and effective rank? Quite a bit of variables involved. The authorization process would have to change (for player consistency. Which by the way, could be done with an irc bot, etc), things like that. I know this isn't about game modifications and whichever but it was kind of an extremity.

Out of my two suggestions, ignoring it would be your best bet.

It if funny how some people wanna tell other people, what they have to do with the server "they own". they pay the servers, they decide what they do with "their own" servers.

If smo wants to have stats on his own server, this smo will do this stats and a redicolous thread like this will nothing change on it.

ps: stupid spanish keyboards, alwazs tzping z instead of y