®RTFC / DZ 2:0 MI3 / 21.11.10

17 replies [Last post]

22. November 2010 - 7:46

#11

Offline

Joined: Mar 2010

Posts:

Re: RTFC / DZ 2:0 MI3 / 21.11.10

wrote:

dont worry Mi3 clan, you will have your next oportunity to win cup in
the next event : ) dont get down in moral, you maked a great work, good
luck in future.

I hope next event will be on real railonly cfg like rr3. :F

Mi3anthropy clan site

23. November 2010 - 6:53

#12

Offline

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts:

Re: RTFC / DZ 2:0 MI3 / 21.11.10

GG Dz, but game wasnt too enjoyble coz of camp overdose...

wrote:

I hope next event will be on real railonly cfg like rr3. :F

This cfg we playing now has nothing to do with railonly, i wonder who the fuck made this possible to even rank games played on this cfg in railonly section... Hope next events will be played no real railonly.cfg and ofc with strict camperalert settings, but now such games are only waste of time... :\

My DeviantART gallery - http://doctor9999.deviantart.com/gallery/

23. November 2010 - 10:38

#13

Offline

Joined: Aug 2010

Posts:

France

Re: ®RTFC / DZ 2:0 MI3 / 21.11.10

well played, gg both

- Rail Squad Team
- BNG Team
- Referee Team

wrote:

OR I HIGHER LAYWJER SHADY CHARAKT0R TO DO DEEP ANAL SEARCH INTO LIGHTDEVEL UND TRIVSTaR !!!

23. November 2010 - 10:50

#14

Offline

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts:

Re: ®RTFC / DZ 2:0 MI3 / 21.11.10

other rail cfgs have too fast rail...
its like strong mg

pew pew you're dead

23. November 2010 - 15:22

#15

Offline

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts:

Re: RTFC / DZ 2:0 MI3 / 21.11.10

wrote:

This cfg we playing now has nothing to do with railonly, i wonder who the fuck made this possible to even rank games played on this cfg in railonly section... Hope next events will be played no real railonly.cfg and ofc with strict camperalert settings, but now such games are only waste of time... :\

Any cfg which is created seems to be put straight into the official ranking cfg's section. I bought this issue up a couple of months ago but apparently this mod is meant to be about "versatility".

wrote: