Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

58 replies [Last post]

5. January 2008 - 22:56

#41

Offline

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts:

Sweden

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

5. January 2008 - 23:49

#42

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

6. January 2008 - 0:48

#43

Offline

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts:

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

I'm very excited to announce we have our first donation for the server!

Thanks to BERT for his contribution!

Anyone else wishing to donate to peoples server may do so here:

Click Here

(p.s. please let me know after making donation... Thanks!)

6. January 2008 - 12:09

#44

Offline

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts:

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

And without pure you can have wallhacks all you want. Non detectable by pb.

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

6. January 2008 - 12:44

#45

Offline

Joined: May 2006

Posts:

Lithuania

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

hm.. i think pure should be always on and pb in callvote list

(\__/)
(+'.'+)
(")_(")
This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny to your signature help him gain world domination.

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.. [G.Orwell]

6. January 2008 - 14:33

#46

Offline

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts:

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

Fact of the day, the reason I wasn't able to play on pb servers when I was cheating was that my pb wasn't working (old version or smth). Anyways pb off but voteable is a good idea.

Excessive Plus Configuration Files

6. January 2008 - 17:46

#47

Offline

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts:

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

MORE DONATIONS.....

Damn this community rocks a lot more than some people give credit.

Thanks to ZACK & RENO for their donations to peoples server.

6. January 2008 - 18:40

#48

Offline

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts:

Should Peoples Server use Punkbuster?

When/If this works and the really active people start joining in bigger numbers an idea would be to put a lock on it and make the password known to the public in the forums.

The joining process would be exactly the same you just "bind k password password".

Anyone who cares enough for e+ to visit the forums ONCE will know the password.

I suggest this cause i see nothing different on this server than the rest of the public servers. Sure more people pay/care for it but technically there is no difference. The only difference might be the serious advertising ;P

Finally If/When it works as a locked server too, you introduce tighter rules, like no fake nicking...maybe? ;]

7. January 2008 - 17:40

#49