Should we keep "AntiWallhack"

22 replies [Last post]
12. May 2016 - 19:48
rage+
Forum moderator
Zack's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts:
Yes
21% (11 votes)
No
64% (34 votes)
Undecided
15% (8 votes)
Total votes: 53
Top
12. May 2016 - 20:39
#1
Roxor
Roxor5682's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"

Voted undecided, but now as I read your other topic, i would vote no.

Top
12. May 2016 - 21:33
#2
rage+
Forum moderator
Zack's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"
Roxor wrote:

Voted undecided, but now as I read your other topic, i would vote no.

Surely it isn't just me that has noticed how broken the game has become?

Top
12. May 2016 - 22:01
#3
Jabs
Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"

The vocal minority > silent majority it appears

Top
13. May 2016 - 1:38
#4
(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT)
Site administrator
haxxus's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts:
US United States
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"

it gets bad for 60-80 ping , imagine 100-150 .. f2 ftw . At this point , pb is worthless against hacks ( says bopoh ) , and antiwallhack is a pain , To sum it up we always end up deciding on a cheater by demo footage mainly above all , so this preventions that aren't working should be eliminated to avoid further dilemma and headaches , imo

Top
13. May 2016 - 9:43
#5
/
q3fun's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"

here no question rage Sad we don't have him!

РЕАЛЬНО ВВЕРИТЕ - ВЫ ВСЕ ЗАЕБАЛИ!!

Top
13. May 2016 - 10:04
#6
/
q3fun's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"
(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:

it gets bad for 60-80 ping , imagine 100-150 .. f2 ftw . At this point , pb is worthless against hacks ( says bopoh ) , and antiwallhack is a pain , To sum it up we always end up deciding on a cheater by demo footage mainly above all , so this preventions that aren't working should be eliminated to avoid further dilemma and headaches , imo

unlaged + xp_delagweapons + xp_iproveprediction and you can play with ping 200..
excessiveplus-mod create lag, i run xp_2.0a with folder baseq3, you will not believe, no lags..

Just in TDMaWHL was 2 AWH (e+ and violence), only e+ no reason use Sad him need update!
Thx easy for getSS sustem!

РЕАЛЬНО ВВЕРИТЕ - ВЫ ВСЕ ЗАЕБАЛИ!!

Top
13. May 2016 - 11:35
#7
Nether
Nether's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"

No, like I said before, I think most of cheaters found their way even with this antiWH so it basically just penalises fair players.

Sounds are spoofed and ennemies take some random ms to appear at corners, it orientates gameplay to luck sometimes.


Top
13. May 2016 - 11:48
#8
echooo ^
echo's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"

Top
13. May 2016 - 15:22
#9
Loxotron
Offline
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"
/ wrote:

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
it gets bad for 60-80 ping , imagine 100-150 .. f2 ftw . At this point , pb is worthless against hacks ( says bopoh ) , and antiwallhack is a pain , To sum it up we always end up deciding on a cheater by demo footage mainly above all , so this preventions that aren't working should be eliminated to avoid further dilemma and headaches , imo

unlaged + xp_delagweapons + xp_iproveprediction and you can play with ping 200..
excessiveplus-mod create lag, i run xp_2.0a with folder baseq3, you will not believe, no lags..

Just in TDMaWHL was 2 AWH (e+ and violence), only e+ no reason use Sad him need update!
Thx easy for getSS sustem!

No reason to use any of it, just leave god damn place without this stupid features and play normal quake without lags. I dont understand how far ppl want to cripple themselves with a small chance that some mythic hacker won't play, so ridiculous.

Top
13. May 2016 - 18:54
#10
(*WASP*PARADISE*)
Creating Paradise's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts:
Re: Should we keep "AntiWallhack"
Loxotron wrote:

/ wrote:
(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
it gets bad for 60-80 ping , imagine 100-150 .. f2 ftw . At this point , pb is worthless against hacks ( says bopoh ) , and antiwallhack is a pain , To sum it up we always end up deciding on a cheater by demo footage mainly above all , so this preventions that aren't working should be eliminated to avoid further dilemma and headaches , imo

unlaged + xp_delagweapons + xp_iproveprediction and you can play with ping 200..
excessiveplus-mod create lag, i run xp_2.0a with folder baseq3, you will not believe, no lags..

Just in TDMaWHL was 2 AWH (e+ and violence), only e+ no reason use Sad him need update!
Thx easy for getSS sustem!

No reason to use any of it, just leave god damn place without this stupid features and play normal quake without lags. I dont understand how far ppl want to cripple themselves with a small chance that some mythic hacker won't play, so ridiculous.

fuck this shit antiwh bullshit. i have enemies appearing in my face so i dont have time to react.

Laptop: Sony Vaio 3D: VCPFX215FX/BI with 1TB SSD Samsung 850 Pro.
Mouse: Logitech G502 Proteus Core.
Pad: Logitech G240.
Keyboard: Logitech K800
Earphones: Westone ES5 Custom IEM with Emerald Green (Envy) Faceplate
Line out Dock: Whiplash Elite Micro TWag V2 Eclipse w\Oyaide plug
Amplifier: Pico Slim Silver
Music player: iPod Classic 7th Gen 160 GB black

Top