Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

9 replies [Last post]
{SGR}?MECHANIC?
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:

Yes I know SGR doesnt play cws, so it isnt my real topic Happy, but the ranking system looks strange to me and I dont think it is fair.

For example:
MR: 12 lost 14 won 28 points
KO: 1 lost 14 won 28 points too !!!

Strange to me, Mr.-clan lost about half of their matches but were as good as KO who lost only 1? No offence to Mr-clan, but wouldnt it be fair to get points in relation to the number of cws?

Only an idea of mine Winking

edit: mm sorry maybe wrong section

Warren G
FELiX's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

When u lost match u lost time too. imo its good system.

bert
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

yes but some won of clans that dont excist anymore and we never played them so no opprtunaty for us to get those points. Sad

{SGR}?MECHANIC?
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

sorry Flex1, but I dont get ur point. Which is the better clan, the one which lost only 1 and won 14 or the one which lost 12 and won 14?

In my opinion its always the first !!1

DARK
DARKLORD's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts:
Re: Strange ranking-system in Clanranking
{SGR}?MECHANIC? wrote:

Yes I know SGR doesnt play cws, so it isnt my real topic Happy, but the ranking system looks strange to me and I dont think it is fair.

For example:
MR: 12 lost 14 won 28 points
KO: 1 lost 14 won 28 points too !!!

Strange to me, Mr.-clan lost about half of their matches but were as good as KO who lost only 1? No offence to Mr-clan, but wouldnt it be fair to get points in relation to the number of cws?

Only an idea of mine Winking

edit: mm sorry maybe wrong section

i do the ranking, and if you read the rules you'd realise if the points are drawn the team with the most games goes ahead, more games = more active clan wars, we want a more active community, so its better that a clan that plays more cw's gets favour in these situations, just because we lost that many games doesnt mean we're any worse or better than KO, those games were actually mainly lost by mr b, our sub team in the league.

if clans are more active and give players more chance to play then we have many more skilled players, this is why we decided a mr b team was a good idea, it gave some players who would otherwise play the chance to play in a league, i only have to say watch mona play now, i honestly beleive she improved alot due to playing nearly every league game.

if clans are afraid to loose, due to loosing points or to having more losses than the team drawn in points with them then alot of players wont play cw, this would be a big shame and would be all due to petty whine about the point system.

in football its goal difference NOT average, in e+ its games played, simple as

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]
Secret's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts:
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

well,

I also think it makes more sense if you lose 1 point for a lost clanwar...
Else clans who simply play more get more points than clans who are better but play less...

But you see that this ranking doesnt show the true skill... and thats what it is supposed to...
Because if it would show that then SWE wouldnt be at such a low place... Winking

But Dark is also right... if teams lose a point for losing a game they might play less against stronger clans...
Still I think losing a point for a lost clanwar would be better...

DARK
DARKLORD's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts:
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

if i took points off for losses then this community will just revolve around the best players and the new or less skilled players wouldnt get much chance to play cw, unless they were in a less skilled clan, then that means the bigger clans cant take on players that have potential and want to improve. because that player will want cw and wont get them cause the clan doesnt want to drop points,

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

{SGR}{SGR}WARNERMAN
warnerman's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts:
ES Spain
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

Well, i suggest one thing to complete this rank, maybe if we add efficency to calculate the points, the points results will be more truly.
i mean the efficiency can be calculated with win and loses cw´s
like in fotball, game played, games wins - game loses --> total efficiency

ok well, i have made one web system to calculate the ranking for the malaga federation of fotbal here, if u want i can translate the system and use to make the ranks here, just an idea.
u can see the system runing here:
http://www.fmalagafutsal.com/estadisticas_futbol/estadisticas.html

grettings

We has been felling ourself like a drop of water out of the ocean, smalls, weak, etc.
What if we introduce the drop into the ocean?
From that perspective the drop do not feel itself anymore small or weak ... Can u feel what it means?
http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=7590772592900521369&hl=es

1337W4R3Z )NWC(
1337w4r3z's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
MX Mexico
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

Well before my post was deleted I pointed that out, just make an average, and dark says that "in football its goal difference NOT average, in e+ its games played, simple as"
Well also in football league all teams play same ammount of games .

(HK)Spider
spider's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts:
Strange ranking-system in Clanranking

i think we should be doing some system like 6 monts per League and clans will have to fix the clan wars ... 2 points for wining 0 for loosing the most wins of course win ...

every 6 month we will know who clans owns..

And when this 6 months past.. the old ranking thread go to history and we start a new league to give chanze to new clans Winking

Quote:
.: | h3ktor dice:
XD
phail ;_;

Visit: http://www.excessiveplus.net/spider/