Strange ranking-system in Clanranking
Yes I know SGR doesnt play cws, so it isnt my real topic , but the ranking system looks strange to me and I dont think it is fair.
For example:
MR: 12 lost 14 won 28 points
KO: 1 lost 14 won 28 points too !!!
Strange to me, Mr.-clan lost about half of their matches but were as good as KO who lost only 1? No offence to Mr-clan, but wouldnt it be fair to get points in relation to the number of cws?
Only an idea of mine
edit: mm sorry maybe wrong section
When u lost match u lost time too. imo its good system.
yes but some won of clans that dont excist anymore and we never played them so no opprtunaty for us to get those points.
Yes I know SGR doesnt play cws, so it isnt my real topic , but the ranking system looks strange to me and I dont think it is fair.
For example:
MR: 12 lost 14 won 28 points
KO: 1 lost 14 won 28 points too !!!Strange to me, Mr.-clan lost about half of their matches but were as good as KO who lost only 1? No offence to Mr-clan, but wouldnt it be fair to get points in relation to the number of cws?
Only an idea of mine
edit: mm sorry maybe wrong section
i do the ranking, and if you read the rules you'd realise if the points are drawn the team with the most games goes ahead, more games = more active clan wars, we want a more active community, so its better that a clan that plays more cw's gets favour in these situations, just because we lost that many games doesnt mean we're any worse or better than KO, those games were actually mainly lost by mr b, our sub team in the league.
if clans are more active and give players more chance to play then we have many more skilled players, this is why we decided a mr b team was a good idea, it gave some players who would otherwise play the chance to play in a league, i only have to say watch mona play now, i honestly beleive she improved alot due to playing nearly every league game.
if clans are afraid to loose, due to loosing points or to having more losses than the team drawn in points with them then alot of players wont play cw, this would be a big shame and would be all due to petty whine about the point system.
in football its goal difference NOT average, in e+ its games played, simple as
well,
I also think it makes more sense if you lose 1 point for a lost clanwar...
Else clans who simply play more get more points than clans who are better but play less...
But you see that this ranking doesnt show the true skill... and thats what it is supposed to...
Because if it would show that then SWE wouldnt be at such a low place...
But Dark is also right... if teams lose a point for losing a game they might play less against stronger clans...
Still I think losing a point for a lost clanwar would be better...
if i took points off for losses then this community will just revolve around the best players and the new or less skilled players wouldnt get much chance to play cw, unless they were in a less skilled clan, then that means the bigger clans cant take on players that have potential and want to improve. because that player will want cw and wont get them cause the clan doesnt want to drop points,
Well, i suggest one thing to complete this rank, maybe if we add efficency to calculate the points, the points results will be more truly.
i mean the efficiency can be calculated with win and loses cw´s
like in fotball, game played, games wins - game loses --> total efficiency
ok well, i have made one web system to calculate the ranking for the malaga federation of fotbal here, if u want i can translate the system and use to make the ranks here, just an idea.
u can see the system runing here:
http://www.fmalagafutsal.com/estadisticas_futbol/estadisticas.html
grettings
Well before my post was deleted I pointed that out, just make an average, and dark says that "in football its goal difference NOT average, in e+ its games played, simple as"
Well also in football league all teams play same ammount of games .
i think we should be doing some system like 6 monts per League and clans will have to fix the clan wars ... 2 points for wining 0 for loosing the most wins of course win ...
every 6 month we will know who clans owns..
And when this 6 months past.. the old ranking thread go to history and we start a new league to give chanze to new clans
sorry Flex1, but I dont get ur point. Which is the better clan, the one which lost only 1 and won 14 or the one which lost 12 and won 14?
In my opinion its always the first !!1