[Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

14 replies [Last post]
¯¯__█ALI█¯¯__
xpaliminium's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts:

Hi,

Add Weapon Time -> Holding which is the time u need to hold fire key before shot starts, default 0

It can be used as a concentrated and devasting shot from a weapon.
Examples :

  • Hold rail's fire for 4 seconds then shot giant rail
  • Hold rocket's fire for 10secs then shot a rocket killing all on the same room (weapon will need larger impact range)

Wanna avoid seeying mow, skull & co Surprise

Check this peacefull place

(HK) GoddaM
goddam's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

Not such a good idea, as players would just move around map holding fire button down, this wouldn't add any skill imo.

xDD LoL AndyRocket)))
n1xin's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

Mb offtop: stop smokin' weed, plz. Xd

¯¯__█ALI█¯¯__
xpaliminium's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

@goddam, note that world doesn't turn around plusN.
think that there are a lot of confs made to have fun in public.
If the config is well done and equilibrated, you can see nice gameplay u don't expect.

Wanna avoid seeying mow, skull & co Surprise

Check this peacefull place

rage+
Forum moderator
Zack's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

could be useful in a new config

rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding
¯¯__█ALI█¯¯__ wrote:

@goddam, note that world doesn't turn around plusN.

fail *g*

goddam was actually talking about that there is no point NOT to hold the fire button, no matter what you do you gotta hold it because it makes sense.

this can work depending on the circumstances, but generally no need.
especially because noone plays alternative configs from what I see.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

METEORKID
Forum moderator Rank moderator
Meteorkid's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding
rUnThEoN?! wrote:

especially because noone plays alternative configs from what I see.

Probably because things like this are not encouraged. however i can not see how this would make the mod worse by adding extra features so f1.


=ANU815=
outeris's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding
METEORKID wrote:

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

especially because noone plays alternative configs from what I see.

Probably because things like this are not encouraged. however i can not see how this would make the mod worse by adding extra features so f1.

definitely F1, 

some time i played if I'm correct, Xtreme Arena or XXcive Mod or mby mr.pants some config.. 

guns had secondary fire at q3, that was interesting : what to choose ? power or speed, long range or short wide spread, etc etc on guns, ...actually first thing it was that thing, and bringed me to e+ as it was more alive mod, with not such strict one idea line as was those mentioned mods that now are dead, ofc i miss that secondary feature

The majority of people think they think, when really they just change their prejudices. Understanding is a matter of will in most cases.

Lietuvių excessiveplus draugija - Lithuanians National Team
Linux (1st E17+Compiz powered ! Built on Debian GNU/Linux.)

MODDB.com all cool things for Quake III Arena @ one place from E+


(HK) GoddaM
goddam's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

UT has this kinda setting on the rocket launcher, the longer held the more rockets produced. speed of game is different though, e+ is fast paced and what i am meaning is that in e+ the opportunity to perform such a function would only be available when not in view of enemy i.e running, hopping round map.

edit#

btw ali, i never mentioned a thing about plusn Worried

rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

more variants of weapons wont really make the hell out of it - since most weapons have an alternative.

for example - mg/lg damage and precision incrased in cost of range
or pg/rl lot of bullets versus 1 rocket with more splash.

or to say it with other words, bigger amount of different weapons won't make anything new, just compare with other games, lot of guns and just the most handy are used.

don't understand me wrong, I don't say it is bad for the mod if we have it, but I am rather saying that atm we need something else then this feature. Ofc is some of the e+ coders is bored enough to code it he can do it.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

=ANU815=
outeris's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] Weapon Time -> Holding

id lovely play rail only cfg with having 2nd rail like in e5( or like mg style) for distraction, as example

kinfa cool to have nades like now, and 2nd sticky 

and etc.. ;]

The majority of people think they think, when really they just change their prejudices. Understanding is a matter of will in most cases.

Lietuvių excessiveplus draugija - Lithuanians National Team
Linux (1st E17+Compiz powered ! Built on Debian GNU/Linux.)

MODDB.com all cool things for Quake III Arena @ one place from E+