wrote:

wrote:

thomasyea wrote:

wrote:

* Match won 2 -1 = 3 points

how about changing this?

We had problems in past with 2 points for winner coz it wasnt fair. With this way winner and the looser take the points they deserve.

those problems mustv'e been made by retards
winning 2:0 - 3 points
winning 2:1 - 2 points
Best explanation is on easy example:
If event is based on points system, then why clan A which won 10 matches but all 2:1 should be on same level of clan B which also won 10 matches but all 2:0 ?
In this situation clan B > clan A but when u give both clans same amount of points for their wins they will have to play tie and with bad luck clan B could lose xd which would be definately not super fair.
Also why do we actualy give 1point to the clan which lost cw but win 1 map (1:2 score)? Easy answer, because they deserve it, they did win 1 map ffs, so let's reward them but when clan wins 2:0 it's not rewarded at all, they get 3 points, same as clan who won 2:1 so why should clans care to win 2:0 ? Going further 2 friendly clans could make some scams too, for example (just example) MR is friendly with Alone clan, obviously MR is favorite for this match and everyone expects them to win easly. But MR and Alone leaders are good friends and they agreed to make it 2:1, it's 3 points for the winner (so no problem for MR) and still +1 point for loser (who actually are winners in this situation too) who normally wouldn't get them if the point system would be good. Think about it, u are always about FAIR PLAY and this point system isn't fair and was forced by some idiots (dunno who but I stand my word no matter who it was).

Seeing a post like this terror, it's clear why you were the only person too stupid to figure out the rules (which were published everywhere) and to drop out of CPM FIGHTCLUB Winner's Bracket:

No deathmatch system in the world penalises winners of a game for losing a map in a game they actually won. Map difference is accounted for, but only as a tie-breaker for clans with even points, and the system you favor is even more flawed than Rayden's one, as hypothetically speaking, a clan could win every single game 2:1 and finish in third or fourth place in this league. This is like ranking football leagues with taking into account both the fulltime and halftime scores: pointless.

wrote:

Ouch, random excessive-dweller (I haven't played for 4 months, cut me some slack!), random nobody double ouch, and inferiority complex - yikes.

I have absolutely no idea about how and where you play your excessiveplus games (tou each his own, Beavis), but every time I check this forum, you're here in one form or another, hence "dweller" and the "inferiority complex" thing comes from the time you had a mental breakdown when my housemate called you a "cunt" on IRC stemming from a non-related conversation.

wrote:

No really, it's not about the idea. The idea is fine and is done in any normal competitive setting. The issue is that you just caaaaan't help yourself - you just have to big yourself up by being a bigger nerd than others are (I'm not sure if you've reached this conclusion yet). There you go, present your idea without all the ego masturbating and I won't have a problem.

I stated a simple fact about where that document came from. Doesn't matter whether it's me, zoot, the president of Azerbaijan or Bopoh, it's just background info on the document, with no ego-tripping intentions. Look, I immediately found a similar example of me posting a gallery, along with me crediting the source and the author. It just looks like you have some sort of personal issues with me and are nitpicking things which aren't really there.

wrote:

What makes your posts so exceptionally provoking is you really have no clue but insist on judging people, my clan had people playing CPMA before you knew what it was. And I was having beers with Cyrus IRL before you even knew there was something called baseq3/CPMA. And yeah, Dreamhack was all the rage when we were 12.*

*Oh shit, look I can play that game too. But I don't cause that would be extremely nerdish????

OT enough I guess.

I've never been to a LAN, I only play CPMA recreationally once in a while and I'm mediocre at it at best, and on top of it, I didn't even mention CPM, you did. I just organised an event there once and over a month ago, and I occasionally do some coverage/shoutcasting work for it I am, however, happy about your drinking partnership with Hanna Montana, and hope that it helps you get rid of all this pent up aggression (unless you meant Cyrus as in "prozac", in which case, he's an awesome dude, and congratulations for being in the 17% of Swedes that partied with him). But yea, all in all, you seem to be extremely passive-aggressive and are reading between the lines way2much (but I recall madbringer saying it's a side effect of playing too much excessive). Good talk, same time next year

shady i dont care even if your point system would be taken out from formula 1 or other super duper baskeball league , im still playing e+ and here im only trolling xd
You on the other hand are not playing E+ and still trying to help this community (or your ego) but nobody nobody nobody cares xd they just ignore u u are making posts 10 times longer than anyone else's and it only makes it worse for u, because 99% skips them because they are too long just get the hell out from here like trance and others did. The end is nigh
U won't believe it but nowadays dranzer has more reads (and definately would have more "like"'s if they would be implemented on this forum) and has bigger influence than u will ever have in future
So better sniff some coke and get back on your trolling spree or just let it go because all this constructive stuff will only make life more empty and this forums more of letters xd

dont give it a shot ? but what ? joining event ? im plus-side clanless at the moment

Mr in