The official EURO2008-thread
wrote:omg doomcore who win man who??? stop statsHe's only saying that Croatia deserved to win more than Turkey, and I support that statement.
Yes, thank you....
wrote:I don't think Holland will wind with a difference of three goals, either they will win 2:1 or 2:0..
..Or not, we'll see.don'T you ever again dare saying netherlands might lose.
fucker.
I didn't say Holland would lose, I said the goal difference would be lower.
Russia played very well last time they played (vs. Sweden).
Hmm we play rather well 1st half and I even can say - better than Holland. Had only few mistakes for defense players but also had some nice moments and 2 good shots for Kolodin. Hope 2nd time will play the same. And need to score in 2nd half or e.t. bcz in after-match penalty we don't have chance versus Van der Sar
GOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Arshavin-Semak-Pavluchenko!!!!!!!!!!!!
And we really play better, better than Holland... omg we must win!!!
Russia plays really really awesome, although they have some lacks in defense.
Anyway I stand for what i wrote earlier, final Italy - Germany.
Holland also have "lack" in defense called van der Sar (really not luck but skill). And anyway we had more moments for scoring, really good moments...
LOL Hazo lack =! luck, lack means deficiency of sth. i meant Russia sometimes suxx in defense. And Van der Saar is one of the two best goalkeepers in this tournament (the second is Boruc:D).
oooh sry Wick, I'm just a bit drunk and nervous so read/wrote wrong van der Sar is marvelous goalkeeper...
and 1-1...
For me both teams deserve the half-final, it's a shame must finish the tournament ni this round.
don'T you ever again dare saying netherlands might lose.
fucker.
I wanted to put a bullet between the eyes of every penguin that didnt wanna screw to save its species.