crc sum of original pak0.pk3 is 43665d07 not C6554324.
Possibly, but i use a filefingerprint and this just checks if the files are right, the fastest way
but it doesnt change fact it shows the file is not valid.
You'r right, i did some checking and found that MY pak0.pk3 is slighty diffrent. I just can't copy the stupid thing from my cd atm to fix it, as my drive is broken (long live NEC *duuh*) so it will have to wait
Actualy, got the original pak0.pk3 now, turned out the checksum verification is good enough, it is compared to another (not true crc32) checksum based on the original pak0.pk3. So if it brings a error your file is definatly faulty no matter how you look at it
: Vodka appetizer 'Boats':
1. A small piece of black bread
2. Spread with a thin layer of mustard
3. A slice of pickled cucumber
4. A thin slice of frozen lard, stuck on a toothpick like a sail
: I suggest Danske Vodka...
: It wasn't me who made a mistake, but someone else. Someone who may have a sandbox blade and an excavator. Maybe he confused the sandbox with the cemetery. This guy is a weird dude. Let's not talk about him. So you like vodka?
: You're digging in the wrong direction. But it suits me fine
: Even if someone changes the provider, it's better for him to continue analyzing server statistics, because he was caught cheating :’(
: No, it's most useless servers! Time itself has proved this. That's why their owners are chasing ratings. So stupid.
: Someone is blocked on the most recognizable servers, so instead of playing, he can do the analysis
: What, "unrated" manipulation with statistics on some servers has come to an end? Now we see a real place of some of them... )
: q3fan is from ukraine, you are still alive bro ?
Actualy, got the original pak0.pk3 now, turned out the checksum verification is good enough, it is compared to another (not true crc32) checksum based on the original pak0.pk3. So if it brings a error your file is definatly faulty no matter how you look at it
Something....