User login
®R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
17. February 2014 - 12:58
#21
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
First of all there are no rule that you can pick TIE map on the FIRST PAGE. It even sounds stupid because it's announced as TIE map? Understand or not wery?
Do you really think anyone checking all the spam on the 10 pages and looking for rules there?
Replay the game, chicken leader.
17. February 2014 - 15:50
#22
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
wrote:First of all there are no rule that you can pick TIE map on the FIRST PAGE. It even sounds stupid because it's announced as TIE map? Understand or not wery?
Do you really think anyone checking all the spam on the 10 pages and looking for rules there?
Replay the game, chicken leader.
Ofcours you are right but on other hand there is no rule that you can't pick tie map as standard, so there is some space for "interpretation" 
I dont understand why, even considering match was against rules, you claim replay. It would be unfair for pTs. TwT broke the rules, lost and you want to reward them with extra chance to win. Its insane.
17. February 2014 - 15:32
#23
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
wrote:Yes, I woke up @ 05:30
In rules its stated that you can pick a tie-map, but you cant play that map anymore as a tie-map.
Can someone pls translate it to russian for him so he understands what i'm actually saying?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks for inform us "on time" (on almost end of league) that we can always pick our dear overkill. I will have that on mind, Jeffy! 
17. February 2014 - 15:56
#24
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
wrote:
Ofcours you are right but on other hand there are no rule that you can't pick tie map as standard, so there is some space for "interpretation"
I dont understand why, even considering match was against rules, you claim replay. It would be unfair for pTs. TwT broke the rules, lost and you want to reward them with extra chance to win. Its insane.
Yes it was never working like this but on this league.
Same situation happened when TWT loaded wrong config to their server, played vs sneaky, lost, and after that sneaky had to replay that match and rewarded twt with extra chance to win.
Now he points that he made some rule on 5th page none seen, hadn't update that on the first page and hadn't notice anyone about that.
Double standards when same actions working different for different clans.
First case was at war vs dunno, when it was obviously even for spectator that they deserved win by wo, 2nd now - when 2 weeks ago he forced clans to replay, now he doesn't want too replay in exactly same case.
Only Diablo on my memory could manage event worse.
p.s Koszmit, if picking tie map could be so obvious, can't you point me couple of games where clans were picking TIE map as non-tie on this league?
I guess it wasn't obvious for anyone, otherwise we would see a lot of played on overkill.
17. February 2014 - 16:01
#25
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
wrote:
Ofcours you are right but on other hand there are no rule that you can't pick tie map as standard, so there is some space for "interpretation"
I dont understand why, even considering match was against rules, you claim replay. It would be unfair for pTs. TwT broke the rules, lost and you want to reward them with extra chance to win. Its insane.Yes it was never working like this but on this league.
Same situation happened when TWT loaded wrong config to their server, played vs sneaky, lost, and after that sneaky had to replay that match and rewarded twt with extra chance to win.
Now he points that he made some rule on 5th page none seen, hadn't update that on the first page and hadn't notice anyone about that.
Double standards when same actions working different for different clans.
First case was at war vs dunno, when it was obviously even for spectator that they deserved win by wo, 2nd now - when 2 weeks ago he forced clans to replay, now he doesn't want too replay in exactly same case.
Only Diablo on my memory could manage event worse.
p.s Koszmit, if picking tie map could be so obvious, can't you point me couple of games where clans were picking TIE map as non-tie on this league?
I guess it wasn't obvious for anyone, otherwise we would see a lot of played on overkill.
I doubt Diablo is capable of managing anything...
So FPS, you saying that q3fan might've just editted the page or something? I just play this league and I am absolutely unaware who is in charge and shit. But my first impression already shows that Q3Fan is fucking around.
We aren't scared to play another match, actually I would love to play a match and pwn TwT again but unfortunately, Q3Fan was high on drugs again during the match so he fucked up. Why should we give him a 2nd chance for this.
17. February 2014 - 16:08
#26
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
pTs, if you insist, it's just CW for rank. but need play TwT map for league. or spit on rules. on your rules
17. February 2014 - 16:18
#27
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
wrote:pTs, if you insist, it's just CW for rank. but need play TwT map for league. or spit on rules. on your rules
I like your attempt at a Haiku poem right there. 
Btw haha is that the movie about a king timetravelling? My parents watched that movie shitloads of times, pretty funny 
17. February 2014 - 16:45
#28
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
wrote:
Yes it was never working like this but on this league.Same situation happened when TWT loaded wrong config to their server, played vs sneaky, lost, and after that sneaky had to replay that match and rewarded twt with extra chance to win.
I got your point. We also had to replay our won match vs AMG who first agreed to play 3v3 than after lost game made a lot of noise and jeff changed his mind and forced us to replay. But this never should be a standard..
wrote:
p.s Koszmit, if picking tie map could be so obvious, can't you point me couple of games where clans were picking TIE map as non-tie on this league?I guess it wasn't obvious for anyone, otherwise we would see a lot of played on overkill.
My "obvious" was an irony ;] I didnt know about this rule but jeff pretended that everybody should know because he answered to nana
17. February 2014 - 17:22
#29
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
ffsQuad vs pTs - our game should not be valid as well but played once again, because we played different config then league config.
there was no respawn after end of each round. how about this?
Shout 14:28:14
: Steff, traitor. That’s a valid message
: Enter a valid Message
: Me, lol
: hello!
: I hope you had a good reason to be absent. Get well soon, my friend.
: Impressive
: I am half Russian and half black. I'm black on the bottom half. Don't forget to lubricate your ass
: ok, bring it on analbolic hohol
: Come tomorrow to watch my battle with ShadyХУЙ at SexyFraggers 8 on central european, 22:00 Moscow time. He said he would win because he was a deft monkey. ХУЙ don't forget to put on makeup, I'll record us on video. You must be beautiful.
: broheim it is oke!!! I saw Moldova elections on the news, and referendum before that. HOPE life will get better (but nothing ever changes)
Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 11 guests online.
Just because some of you dont read the rules good enough or are just not smart enough to understand them shouldnt complain so much for just a match that isnt even played by those persons.
Why are you posting here #aliencareM?
Why are you here Famous Princes Sandy?
And zar.pk3 you are the worst of them all x))))
This topic can be locked for my part... damn e+ drama