i used to be ok with the mysteries of arthur c clarke, but came to realise he is a bit of a sensationalist and can lead people a bit astray with some ungrounded assumptions that are not entirely scientificly based, and a lot of stuff solely based on 'dubious eyewitness reports' this is suprising for a man of his high calibre but a genius and outstanding inventor none the less. if you saw his series called connections, this was enlightening..

wrote:

@GoddaM, yes i have had *some* serious posts on this forum.. lets say: 0.99% serious..

0.99% - so you mean that 6 of your 628 posts are worth reading..? :geek:

Nice, few years ago my big interesst was astronomy, ofc I will look at it.

Btw, so it's night 26/27 august or 27/28 ?

wrote:

eh.. i like astronomy, but i guess it was be 4 years ago :roll:

i had a telescope from which i could see the moon, lol... but it ended when i accdentally dropped it from the balcony..

wrote:

It's a hoax, mars won't appear as big as the moon in many many years, maybe never.

you mean, until a moon sized asteroid hits it and sends the chunks at Earth