wrote:

besides that topic, some funny objective fact about golly and mates.

ric ffa still runs version 2.2a and therefor supports legal wh for every admin.

yeah, just in case that ppl like you connect, we have to push against with something.

nice try to distract from your problems here, but that RIC runs 2.2a has other reasons, than allowing the admin team to cheat in a silly arcade mod. enough said, back to your case now plz. jeeez, imbeciles everywhere.

wrote:

nice try to defend shox, the only difference in 2.2a and 2.2b is the fixed wallhack via rcon bug, so it just leaves one conclusion.

for my problem, you just need to wait 2-3 hours and its solved probably.

it leaves the conclusion, that you have a wild imagination. accusing without proof makes a credible impression, right?! especially when it's done by someone who is beeing accused himself.
btw. 2-3 hours... that's a pretty long time to wipe all hax from the disc- awesome! C:

wrote:

sorry m8, your problem will not be solved in 2 or 3 hours. This will take years!
And as we all could see last week, wallhack can easily be used on 2.2b servers with no admin rights

so this demo is wallhack for you guys?

http://www.speedyshare.com/files/30302978/Skull_cpm14.rar

@shox:
There is no reason to have the server 2.2a if it could be 2.2b, so tell me a good reason why it isn't.

As proof? I never said admins cheat (beside golly and i have no idea if he is admin) - I just said they support it someway.

wrote:

Sorry ? Why do we have to let you know our reason? Don' t get that.

I would say for your own good, because whoever knows the background of it is free to say your admins are cheaters?

wrote:

wrote:

Sorry ? Why do we have to let you know our reason? Don' t get that.

I would say for your own good, because whoever knows the background of it is free to say your admins are cheaters?

what you would say or not, is simply uninteresting. you are not in the position to judge anyone, while you are highly suspected of using cheats. in fact you just try to distract from that case and that makes it even more suspicious. you accused ppl of cheating with proofs, found in certain demos, that only looked like a funny joke, compared to the demos of you, violence posted here. if it was someone else in that demo, i'm sure, you would have made a 40-pages-thread a la "<random name> final evidence!" out of it already.