CHEATER REPORT

1058 replies [Last post]
-VDTA-PJAX
PJax's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT

*TC*Camel-XP(saying): Lems if u don't see i'am the Leader of TC - The Camels clan. Then i don't want to anyone use my nick name because the topic name is 'cheater report'. I just want to try for yourself if i'm good for LEM member. Please more respect for me, i mean that respect what i have for good players like you Bert and Ratz. Thats all, End of Log.

play hard, you'll forget the fear...

EVOL.WAX
Forum moderator
WAX's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT
-VDTA-PJAX wrote:

Even if enemy is in fog, and u didn't see his model just simply target under and center of nick if u practice this u will have score like camel vs. Bert.

I don’t agree, the name moves around above the player too much to give an accurate target point. like i already said i think its more a distraction than a help

parasight [E+]
parasight's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT
EVOL.WAX wrote:

I don’t agree, the name moves around above the player too much to give an accurate target point. like i already said i think its more a distraction than a help

I tried it yesterday, made a few screenshots but since my i-net is down at the moment, I couldn't post them (they basically look just like Bert's).

Anyways, pjax is right, with a bit practice it's not a problem to hit your target in the fog, the name does help a lot in these cases. It may be distracting for some, but it isn't for everyone. He's clean, IMO.

mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT

maybe it would be useful:

1vs1 bert: wax

both with xp_drawname 1

Publishing result here as a Demo.

I think that helps during the clarification of the case

in my mind, camel is not guilty.

EVOL.WAX
Forum moderator
WAX's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT

Surely much better is camel v bert with xp_drawname 1, and a few spectators.

its a map i never play so I don’t think you will get enough info out of it

EVOL.WAX
Forum moderator
WAX's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT
parasight [E+] wrote:

with a bit practice it's not a problem to hit your target in the fog, the name does help a lot in these cases. It may be distracting for some, but it isn't for everyone. He's clean, IMO.

ok fair enough, I haven’t played it as much as you para, sounds like you have more experience to draw on. I only played about 3 maps, and I didn’t see it help me at all. But its good that you can give info, and if this can clear it up then hopefully an innocent person will be saved form the death tag of cheater.

mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT

OK, wax, that is not the correct way of a democracy.

The suspect does not have to prove his innocence, but the prosecutor must prove his guilt .

If I would be Camel, I would not have any pleasure to prove to you, that I not cheat.

As long as one can not prove Camel that he cheated, he is than to handle innocently. (Any Clan in their own responsiblity)

Camel has explained how he was able to frag Bert, therefore the complainant must check that if he is not satisfied with the explanation.

EVOL.WAX
Forum moderator
WAX's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT
mow Q [EN] wrote:

OK, wax, that is not the correct way of a democracy.

The suspect does not have to prove his innocence, but the prosecutor must prove his guilt .

If I would be Camel, I would not have any pleasure to prove to you, that I not cheat.

As long as one can not prove Camel that he cheated, he is than to handle<A[handle|treat]> innocently. (Any Clan in their own responsiblity)

Camel has explained how he was able to frag Bert, therefore the complainant must check that if he is not satisfied with the explanation.

I do not expect camel to do or feel anything I’m stating opinion im not
holding court. Happy

if you want to see it like that, then it seems the prosecution has no more evidence to show. And the case rests. which is in a way is what I said.

parasight [E+]
parasight's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT

Excellent post, mow. The statement should probably be made a sticky to remind people of that. I can't stand the "I can feel he's a cheater, let's bash him"* sentimentality anymore.

Anyways, back to business, who's up next? Winking

(*not referring to wax's posts specifically)

EVOL.WAX
Forum moderator
WAX's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts:
CHEATER REPORT
parasight [E+] wrote:

Excellent post, mow. The statement should probably be made a sticky to remind people of that. I can't stand the "I can feel he's a cheater, let's bash him"* sentimentality anymore.

Anyways, back to business, who's up next? Winking

(*not referring to wax's posts specifically)

i would hope you weren’t reefing to my post at all Happy I don’t think in anyway if fits what how is describing ....the bit at the end was indeed making that point already.

“hopefully an innocent person will be saved form the death tag of cheater"

That’s exactly the point I was making. its so easy for people to go on a suspicious feeling and not facts I think you both misunderstood me Happy

Anyway this is getting dangerously close babble and I’m aware I’m helping it along the it along the way Happy

I defiantly agree mow you should make your post a sticky