wrote:

laktostolerant wrote:

Nowadays you can get a crt screen that can manage 100 - 120 hz almost for free (People are throwing them on the dumps to be honest XD), it really adds up to the game when you can see all movements crystal clear.

just picked up a 19" crt (i guess its 19") from a friend who hasnt been using it for years, he said since its getting wasted there anyways u can pick it up and i have 3 other 17" crt here who do the 120hz job on 800x600 just to show how true laktos is with this words.

haha skull u are lucky here in Spain at least in my zone...is difficult to find it...and if i find...is in onother part of Spain and shipping of that big ''thingy'' is more expensive than monitor itself

wrote:

anyone want a junk lcd brand new ?

no thx, i own 3+ crt's

Sad news, good luck with real life.

wrote:

The e+ code hasnt been changed according to the devs, kinda hard for the devs to do anything about it if it isnt in code (Almost impossible). That doesnt leave much options for me, as I doubt it would be beneficial to the majority of the community to start pushing for 1.03 servers again.

Actually to be fair I don't think that would be true any longer, but I can't assure it since I never got access to the 1.03 code. After all this time and all the testing done I've come to the conclusion that forward/side movement from 1.04+ physics is indeed different from 1.03's and that the change was made to match cpma's physics (to be more technical, acceleration is increased from 10 to 15 and friction is lowered from 8 to 6). We'll probably add options to change these values in next version (tho custom values for this will add prediction errors for clients using older versions). No idea if that alone would be the source of all of the differences in feeling tho.

E+ movement physics feel a lot different from cpm. The most annoying thing is how it handles small ledges and elevations - either you get ejected high into air, or stop dead in your tracks. Skull could probably elaborate more on the subject, and throw down some real data, i can only say that in general it feels a lot less "responsive" and intuitive, at least when you're really trying to use ground movement.