Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable for moderation?

117 replies [Last post]

25. November 2007 - 2:50

#51

Offline

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

i spoke weeks ago with term to set some e5 players as moderators and suggest secrect & kinetic and now seth too cause they are neutral persons, know english language well and do no flame. But looked like he dosent wanted to listen or understand me :roll:

-->Excessive comes from learning the advantages and disadvantages of each weapon, what weapon is called for in different situations, and what works best against each weapon in the hands of opponents<-- All Other Is Brainless Shooting

25. November 2007 - 2:55

#52

Offline

Joined: May 2005

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

wrote:

im always wonder why u guys everytime split us, i do personaly think moderator dont must play at all eny config or game to do his job right

and im realy dont get the arguments like he must know ppl, mater of fact is beter if he dont know them and then he will be more fair in judgment cuz he wont favorize noone

when you know the behalf of some e5 players, it makes easier to figure out what's the problem and who is the troublemaker.

wrote:

mow about me
all time i post one war and something bad happend

that's not a coincidence

25. November 2007 - 2:56

#53

Site administrator

Offline

Joined: Feb 2004

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

wrote:

But looked like he dosent wanted to listen or understand me :roll:

This is not the case Silence.

I urge you to read here: http://forums.excessiveplus.net/viewtopic.php?t=19824

I will not be adding people to the moderation list who are not willing to undertake the duties, hence the reason why expressions of interest where filed by candidates who are willing.

I did not see Kinetic & Secret file an application of canditure, perhaps it would be in your best interest to question them Silence as to why they did not put their name down before making obscene conclusions?

ExcessivePlus Administrator

25. November 2007 - 3:00

#54

Offline

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

sil they only needed send one form when this was open, term said in forums,

bodz..
not all is my problem (and my friends in q3 know good)the thing is i am fuc leader then all shits is for the leader, like you when ed had problems

not speak more, like term said its for voting and nothing more

- I apologized my tvl's members and I pleased them to play match vs fuc sunday but they definately disagree ... Dunno why - abarth isnt whole tvl.

25. November 2007 - 11:42

#55

Offline

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts:

Belgium

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

lol gasol if you become moderator i m gonna stop q3 LOL

>>PURE E5 WHORE<<

25. November 2007 - 11:45

#56

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

how a e5 player should become mod, if no one of e5 wrote an application? Its not the forum-admins fault that no e5 player, except gasol, wrote an explanation.

there was a therad before this, where all was explained how to applicate to become mod.

EVERYBODY had the possibility to get on the list above.

this is for me a good reason why no e5 player, except gasol, is on the list, because the interest on reading forums is far too low, otherwise there would be more e5 players on the list.

U guys complaining without reading the forum :roll:

no application, no e5 mod, easy as that. e5-players-fault.

25. November 2007 - 11:45

#57

Offline

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

Cute. So now people vote for Gasol, because he was the only person from E5 to apply.

Neutral judgement is DEAD for me in this place..

wrote:

thats why all moderaters are plus players or ex plus players ?

great one

Considering that E5 players are more tourists than regular forum users, is it any wonder?

25. November 2007 - 11:52

#58

Offline

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

wrote:

wrote:
im always wonder why u guys everytime split us, i do personaly think moderator dont must play at all eny config or game to do his job right

and im realy dont get the arguments like he must know ppl, mater of fact is beter if he dont know them and then he will be more fair in judgment cuz he wont favorize noone

when you know the behalf of some e5 players, it makes easier to figure out what's the problem and who is the troublemaker.

exacly that what i meant to dont judge over forum personal problems but behaving in forum, im would never allow someone lowering other one in forum cuz that guy wasynt nice to him on server if they have problem they should atleast dont bring it to forum, and then what e5* admin will know both guys but will be a friend of these guy who namecaled they guy whos writing crap on board now and will ban the person who said crap in forum, and then we have other sytuation the admins hold side of guy who wroten crap on board cuz he know the second one namecaled the one who typing bs on forum, in server, and will allow the guy whos typing on board bad things to continue

pfff

Quote:

thats why all moderaters are plus players or ex plus players ?

y ofcorse...
i think the reason of that lay far away from yours accusations of favorizing a config

wrote:

all excessive its dominated by plus i must say it again leave e5 for e5 players i dont care a but plus so plus dont care a but e5 so hq if u will be moderator of e5 Start play it if no thank you and good bye

the prob is i alredy playing e5, but i dont see no point to play it more offten as i do now, and also dosent see a single point that i must be e5 player if i wana clean forum as a moderator

@madbringer, i said to, i think, trance that ppl will vote for thier firends in here, and thats quite obvious whats hapening now here, why they should vote for someone on the list if they dont know the guy, beter to give *power* to someone who they know, and also im seeying in here some another sucess like in that poll about confing e5 over bro

wrote:

man, if you become mod please use the "." symbol more often

i wont be a mod, cuz i dont fill ppl *needs*, and i wont use '.' more often cuz it brings me bad luck

lets face it

- no english skill at all
- i dont know all ppl (mostly e5 cfg part of this board)
- i cant be a mod cuz im from ko and ko alredy has a guy with *power*

25. November 2007 - 12:03

#59

Offline

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

man, if you become mod please use the "." symbol more often

25. November 2007 - 12:04

#60

Offline

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts:

Of the following names listed, which would be the most suitable

Yes, i was afraid that would happen too, but i hoped people would remain cold-blooded, and would, at least, try to be neutral. That's not the case, it seems.

I would really much rather have a moderator that i do not like personally, but know he can do his job well, than someone i do like, but i know would be a terrible mod. Apparently, some people just want to have someone they know "up there"...