i voted for 3 months because he cheated and came true with admitting what he did, and he looks realy sorry, so if we learn more on what he did / used it will improove our help to PB and shadow's willing to help us by telling the cheats means he isnt realy bad as all say about him

hmmm i dont care if he can play on plus ranking.. but the whole ban thing starts to affect also individual servers.. and when hammer allready banned him on borg it really sucks.. there are so few players left on e5r that i am even happy about an ex cheater to play against (i am very convinced that he never used a cheat when i played him public or fw (because he just was not strong enough))

voted for 6 months ban.

Mainly cuz of his attempts to hide his identity in other account and new clan and saying sorry AFTER all that failed.

wrote:

(because he just was not strong enough)

wrong approach, imo.

as for poll... shadow just seems to be a kid with childish acting: lying here and there, cheating, wannabeing a top player without any efforts, insulting when he's nothing to say, saying things on demand (like with terror's apologizing thingy), etc. i think this all should be taken into account when one gives his/her vote in this poll.
12 months from my side. <- a huge dot.

12 months is like a ban forever. He will forget what e+ is (if he stops playing after some time)... after 12 months he will be playing other, newer games, i guess and will never return back.

giving a ban for 2 months of the comming holydays, the time, when younger ppl have most free time to play games, is sad.
if it was up to me, i would unban him on the 1.7. (he wouldn't be thinking 6 months during his ban, what bad he had done..lol) and then, if he cheats again, ...he would fuck his second chance.

i know it's like this, that the punnishments for cheating are high, but in my opinion, they are too high.