You are skullhead

Hello! My name is Martin Goldberg, Mr Kielczynski's lawyer, consigliere
and confidant. I am representing Mr. Kielczynski, and am here on
official business. Let's get down to it.

It is Mr. Kielczynski's belief that you "crossed the line" by calling
him the way you did (the way you called him shall be henceforth known as
<S-word>), and he asked me to "sort things out" with you in a
"civilized" manner (as he himself was unable to do anything but foam at
the mouth at the time). As he said, he wanted to "break your kneecaps",
"tie you up like a pig", "rape in ass until your body breaks apart" and
"feed the remains to his dogs" and then "rape again".

On behalf of Mr. Kielczynski, i would like to put forth this cease and
desist order placed upon your person for violating every proper civil
conduct rule known to Mankind by calling him <S-word here>. Being
the emotionally volatile person that he is, Mr. Kielczynski took that
savage insult pretty hard. Let's just say he will be unable to speak in
but a weak rasp for a while, as he almost blew out his larynx uttering
dark and terrible pagan curses (very popular in this part of Poland) for
the better half of this day. He will also need to buy a wig for he
ripped out several fistfuls of his hair out of frustration. And a new
set of fingernails, for he viciously bit them out, his fingertips but
bloodied, ruined stumps of gore now. AS you can see, you were the cause
of quite a lot of nervous tension for my client, and we both would very
much like for you to: 1) Stop, 2) Sincerely Apologize, 3) Transfer Your
Alloted Material Goods As Compensation To My Client, 4) Die In Ass While
Having Your Face Spermed By Blarogi M8 and 5) Xd plz

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,

Martin Goldberg.

Shalom Mr Goldberg! Unfortunately, Mr Dupa, who is my client and
business associate, is away in Colombia on a business trip for a few
days.

I, Moishe Liebermann, myself a practitioner of law and legal partner,
during a brief satellite telephone conversation with Mr Dupa,
heard him say "OOOO BLYA DA PAWEL CRAPBRINGER NAXYN, PIDAR BLYAD", which
roughly translates into "I acknowledge Mr Goldberg's client's despair,
however i would like to dispute the current charges brought forth, and
give Mr Lieberman the power of attourney". I have studied the charges
and claims yuo have brought up in detail, and, on Mr Stevenson's
request, would like to counter offer the following:

From your current list of demans, My client only agrees to Figure 5, "Xd
plz". However, he understand that it would be not sufficient enough,
and additionally is offering a plate of seafood (fish dicks) as well as
"rape crapbringer in ass". My client that it is a reasonable counter
offer, since, he claims that it is his right to freedom of speech,
additionally citing the following facts to defend his case:

1) Both "Skullhead"(from now only referenced as "S-word") and "madbringer" have more than 9 letters

2) http://www.nordicbots.com/?id=66&net=quakenet&cid=76881 Showing same level of activity for both in the past 7 days (i.e. none)

3) Ina. AGHAGHAGAHGAHGHAGHAGHA.

I hope you would take all of this into consideration and gladly accept
my counter-offer, otherwise we will sue Your client for slander.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely Yours,

Moishe Liebermann

Delighted to be hearing from you, Mr. Liebermann!

Me and my client were afraid your client had skipped country in hopes of
avoiding penal action, we are glad to know he is away on a business
trip in beautiful Colombia. Of course, we wish him a quality time,
Robbie Keane style, ha ha!

But, back to the matter at hand. While my client acknowledges your
clients willingness to negotiate and sees it as a sign of good will, he
simply cannot accept the terms presented in your letter. He would like
to henceforth propose a more flexible offer, hopefully one which your
client will find reasonable and suitable to accept. Here are the updated
terms:

1) Xd plz

It goes without saying, and you already said your client accepts. Let us speak of it no more and consider it a deal.

2) Rape in ass

Unfortunately, my client still sees this as a
necessity. However, he also told me to say that "no homo" is involved
and it's all in the name of science.

3) Public recognition of the fact that my client is, in fact, not Skullhead.

While my client sees the similarities you yourself presented, he would like to confront them with the following facts:

[x]My client is not retard imo

hopefully this should put a definite end to the ridiculous claim. It
would also be worth noting that your client, as a man that had, himself,
dealings with a FPB*, he would appreciate where's he's coming from, detesting such comparisons.

*Fat Psychotic Bitch

We did our best to construct the above list with both your clients and
mine best interests in mind. We hope that in putting so much effort into
this we did show you and your client that we are determined to reach
our goal that is clearing my client's good name. We anticipate your
cooperation.

Kind Regards,

Martin Goldberg

Thank you for such a quick reply, Mr. Goldberg!

After another quick satellite exchange with my client, I would like to
provide a further levelling of terms. First of all, my client
appreciates Your and Your client's wishes about the business trip, and
personally appreciates Your willingless to negotiate in avoiding a
deadlock, as it is best to move on for everybody. My client is beginning
to acknowledge the harshness of comparing Your client to <S-word>
however he still finds parts of the settlement doubtful.

1) Xd plz

Acceptance to Article 1 from both parties, so,
therefore, no more shall be spoken of it, it will only be mentioned in
the settlement contracts

2) Rape in Ass

My client also agrees to this point. Since it was
your proposition on your final proposition, it shall be signed and no
more spoken of it.

3) Public recognition of the fact that my client is, in fact, not Skullhead.

[x] My client is not retard imo

I am glad that your client accepts the similarities, however there is a
minor dispute that my client would like to bring up in Exhibit A:

01:44:30 «@Memphish» fnk pole

01:44:47 «@Brobert_Redford»

01:44:52 «@Brobert_Redford» i retard i no understand

01:44:57 «@Brobert_Redford» TALK MULE HE TRANSLATET

01:45:03 —› join » ‹kg› ‹~kg@bpo86.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl›As
you see in Exhibit A, Your client personally admits that, in fact, "he
retard he no understand", then he requests to talk to his mule for
translation. The mule promptly joins 6 seconds later. If Pan Krystopf
Galias or Hrvoje "rtz" Tito were present at this ESR hearing today, they
could be witnesses. However, Pan Galias has no internet and is
currently playing through KOTOR2, and Mr Tito is relaxing after work, in
a pile of puke (hopefully his own), with a blunt in the mouth.

My client however, after being reminded of the FPB* episode, would like to remove Article 3 of the original dispute. It no longer stands.

*Fat Psychotic Bitch

Should this minor technicality be sorted out, my client is ready to sign
the settlement. At this stage, it is in everybody's interests to solve
this position as soon as possible, so the proverbial ball is currently
in your court. Me personally, as well as my client, would like to
personally thank You and Your client in striving to solve this in the
interests best for everybody.

Sincerely Yours,

Moishe Liebermann