63Maxpackets

65 replies [Last post]
25. December 2013 - 19:10
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany

its a mystery.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
25. December 2013 - 23:13
#1
^LAGGYLOVA*
Ultimaq's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts:
PL Poland
Re: 63Maxpackets

nub merry christmas little skull Big grin

"Zastrzelcie mnie na łące"

z zakręconego nawet salomon nienaleje

Top
25. December 2013 - 23:21
#2
D3L1GH7
TanaKa's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts:
Re: 63Maxpackets

Cl_maxpackets different of 125 should be forbidden. You set basic net settings rules, why trying to avoid it or tweaking it to get something more than your opponent?

By the way, I've found something interesting about your ping after we met on MR 1V1.
I tried to delay too my allowed bandwidth to Quake 3 and adding some jitter (not constant delay) and I get the advantages of a high ping without packetloss and with the same sync as low ping on the server. Maybe that's what you are using? Of course, no ACS or PB can check this. Unfair advantage, and faking a cheap internet provider. It's a bit like positive timenudge but more powerful. So my real ping is 50ms but I'm playing with 90ms without packetloss, thanks for the tip, Skull.

"Skill is when luck becomes a habit".

Top
26. December 2013 - 2:00
#3
EVILUTION
fiendsin's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts:
Re: 63Maxpackets
D3L1GH7 wrote:

well I've thought of it actually too, because whenever I play vs skull or few other people, very few, everytime Im being shot I feel a lag, wich cancels out my rail.
at first I was thinking it only could be nonsense crafted by my mind,
but since you Delight put this out on a plate so clearly, it may actully be true.


Sometimes I wish I was a NEET again, but life is too fucking expensive man.
The weak plot revenge, the strong forgive and the Lucky forget, but Fiend, Fiend no longer gives a shit

◀█ BIG BOB wrote:
Man you even sound like Lego's

You Fuckers wrote:
I would cut my fifth finger to bang her actually

You Fuckers wrote:
BELIEVE IN BLASPHEMY

Top
26. December 2013 - 5:58
#4
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: 63Maxpackets
D3L1GH7 wrote:

Cl_maxpackets different of 125 should be forbidden. You set basic net settings rules, why trying to avoid it or tweaking it to get something more than your opponent?

By the way, I've found something interesting about your ping after we met on MR 1V1.
I tried to delay too my allowed bandwidth to Quake 3 and adding some jitter (not constant delay) and I get the advantages of a high ping without packetloss and with the same sync as low ping on the server. Maybe that's what you are using? Of course, no ACS or PB can check this. Unfair advantage, and faking a cheap internet provider. It's a bit like positive timenudge but more powerful. So my real ping is 50ms but I'm playing with 90ms without packetloss, thanks for the tip, Skull.

here you have the exact settings:
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3187909041

I already played with low ping and 125 maxpackets, for me it feels better and technically it's better too.

Anyways, lets test your new lovely settings in the next match, let me feel da skillboooost

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
26. December 2013 - 8:55
#5
//▲~ GMZ ~▲\\
Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts:
Re: 63Maxpackets
^LAGGYLOVA* wrote:

nub merry christmas little skull Big grin

Ulti, godamn.. for 4 Fridays I am here waiting to give the people of E+ some nice show.. but you never show up.. and only absence.. people got bored and I can't provide all the fun by my own!!

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

D3L1GH7 wrote:
Cl_maxpackets different of 125 should
be forbidden. You set basic net settings rules, why trying to avoid it
or tweaking it to get something more than your opponent?

By the way, I've found something interesting about your ping after we met on MR 1V1.
I
tried to delay too my allowed bandwidth to Quake 3 and adding some
jitter (not constant delay) and I get the advantages of a high ping
without packetloss and with the same sync as low ping on the server.
Maybe that's what you are using? Of course, no ACS or PB can check this.
Unfair advantage, and faking a cheap internet provider. It's a bit like
positive timenudge but more powerful. So my real ping is 50ms but I'm
playing with 90ms without packetloss, thanks for the tip, Skull.

here you have the exact settings:
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3187909041

I already played with low ping and 125 maxpackets, for me it feels better and technically it's better too.

Anyways, lets test your new lovely settings in the next match, let me feel da skillboooost

Watch out Delight.. a confidence means there still some tricks beyond your knowledge! try to PM Ultima he would probably teach you few important other stuff about advantages while playing against other players, but that is depending on the mood..


Have fun at E+ and never take it with hard feelings no matter how much you lose nor how much stupid or dump or punk or bad or blithering idiot the player you are playing with really is, it's just a game and we are here to have fun and enjoy our times!!

Top
26. December 2013 - 10:13
#6
BOZO
Bozo's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: 63Maxpackets
rUnThEoN?! wrote:

its a mystery.

No, it isn't. It's the rounded half of 125 and the ideal number of packets for low-bandwidth connections.

Top
26. December 2013 - 19:10
#7
mago**
OSTAP.MAGO's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts:
Re: 63Maxpackets

i agree with d3light there no syncing between two players with different maxpackets
and maybe we need to think about remake the cfg

unlagging game can bring so much happiness

Top
26. December 2013 - 22:54
#8
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: 63Maxpackets

63 maxpackets is neither a hidden value nor a forbidden one. It is known since years, a lot of people took a look at netcode problems and optimal settings.
There is a reason why our servers do not run at 125 sv_fps, go look it up delight, maybe you will also stumble about a technical explaination of your thoughts.

Because right now, server sends 30 snaps/s to you no matter how many packets a client sends, 63 or 125.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
27. December 2013 - 18:43
#9
D3L1GH7
TanaKa's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts:
Re: 63Maxpackets

Then watch this, closely, mmmh?

"Skill is when luck becomes a habit".

Top
27. December 2013 - 18:56
#10
xXx
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
Re: 63Maxpackets

yeah now u show hows ping working.... packets have nothing to do with ur hitbox

Top