BRO side "invasion"

78 replies [Last post]
8. July 2007 - 22:28
#11
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
BRO side "invasion"
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL wrote:

@ skull in those cw posts u given us are wars with pb only and pure 0.
its sure u know why?
bcoz clans on bro r writing pb on pure on like normal behaviour.
i can post my all cw's with pb and pure so what nobody will prove there wasnt pure on. thats why all cw's should be posted by refs!

any proofs for that?
get eyes man!

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
9. July 2007 - 10:02
#12
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL
Immortal's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
BRO side "invasion"
rUnThEoN?! wrote:


any proofs for that?
get eyes man!

U want proofs?
I POSTED CWS where we played on bro with pb or even without it as Pb & Pure.
and noone had any excuses for that so its legal on bro.

and many clans is doing the same thing I was on not 1 cw that was played without pure and even without pb sometimes and posted as Pb + Pure cw!


Top
9. July 2007 - 10:10
#13
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
BRO side "invasion"
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL wrote:

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

any proofs for that?
get eyes man!

U want proofs?
I POSTED CWS where we played on bro with pb or even without it as Pb & Pure.
and noone had any excuses for that so its legal on bro.

uh, wich bro cws u posted? cant remember one and i thought cws by h2o are posted by jackpot.

[>.B.<]IMMORTAL wrote:
@ skull in those cw posts u given us are wars with pb only and pure 0.

dood, give us written prooves that THOSE cws were played without pb and pure

[>.B.<]IMMORTAL wrote:

and many clans is doing the same thing I was on not 1 cw that was played without pure and even without pb sometimes and posted as Pb + Pure cw!

first that doesnt make sense
second thing is, u should have report that with prooves!

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
9. July 2007 - 10:13
#14
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL
Immortal's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
BRO side "invasion"

what kind of proof u want?

i dont see any proofs that can be made.
maybe u wish somethink?

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

uh, wich bro cws u posted? cant remember one and i thought cws by h2o are posted by jackpot.

that is not your bussines Big grin

get it to your head skullhead that this is corrupted as hell. and u dont want to see that!


Top
9. July 2007 - 10:31
#15
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
BRO side "invasion"
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL wrote:

what kind of proof u want?

i dont see any proofs that can be made.
maybe u wish somethink?

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

uh, wich bro cws u posted? cant remember one and i thought cws by h2o are posted by jackpot.

that is not your bussines Big grin

get it to your head skullhead that this is corrupted as hell. and u dont want to see that!

my business is to inform myself about the cws other clans played, since i, as a clanleader, have to be informed.
i want that u proof ur words.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
9. July 2007 - 10:38
#16
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL
Immortal's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
BRO side "invasion"

how can i proof u that. i ask once again?
without blaming myself?


Top
9. July 2007 - 11:04
#17
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
BRO side "invasion"
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL wrote:

how can i proof u that. i ask once again?
without blaming myself?

a proof should credible,also if u cant without blame urself its ur problem.
if u cant proof pls stfu

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
9. July 2007 - 11:24
#18
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
BRO side "invasion"

@the redicolous claim of the great >>Immortal<<

  • all 54 ranked cws by 2!Sweet are played on pb+pure (except maybe 1 not at the very beginning).
  • KO, DRT, LEM, C4, EVOL i am 100 % sure, that they dont participate any RCW without PB+Pure. (also maybe 1 or 2 exceptions)

So, u call me lier, u call KO lier, u call DRT lier, u call LEM lier, u call C4 lier, u call evol lier. This clans + 2!Sweet played already together 236 Ranked-CWs. In ur theory just 47 wars of them was played pb+pure?

Further i spected a few R-CWs, and they was also PB+Pure.

U call 8/10 of BRO-Side lier.

Btw, everybody who say it can not be prooved, that a cw is played pure. U just need to make a demo, and as soon u are on connection screen to demo, than u c, if pure was enabled. ("unlagged server, pure server")

[/]

Top
9. July 2007 - 11:51
#19
x.foksie'loy.drt?
foksie's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
BRO side "invasion"

i have demos from almost all drt wars, and if you play them you can see that PURE were 1. and PB as well.

also, yes you can proove something. its enough you check the server using >< spider when the war is on. It will have written next to it if pb and pure are on.

In bro side case you will see its always on.

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

Top
9. July 2007 - 12:02
#20
[>.B.<]IMMORTAL
Immortal's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
BRO side "invasion"
x.foksie'loy.drt? wrote:


In bro side case you will see its always on.

u are wrong!

u got it why u call only 6-7 clans? what about other clans 20-30 on bro?
they have no match?

Not only Ko Drt Lem c4 evol and 2!s are playing on this f mod!

ok u want it lets blame someone. no proofs for that bcoz there isnt any screenshoot that shows if it as pb or pure on in this game [that should be done in next e+ release]

wk, uo, bod, hm, dpr, fc, cf, aft, tnt, bng, bac, tropic, re, st, gbs, td, def, be

How u can proove that their cw's are with pb and with pure??
they are writing almost always they played with PB & PURE.

Now u can answer me?


Top