User login
®CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
31. August 2011 - 11:10
#42
Re: CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
GG sneaky 
31. August 2011 - 12:15
#43
Re: CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
Ok Milena. i was drunk. thats all. gG again nice game..
btw why ur clan is not in pure cup ? ok, u dont like rr bcuz its campy bla bla bla but mbe some other guys from ur clan wanted to play in this cup. it was only ur decission?
31. August 2011 - 15:58
#44
Re: CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
wrote:Ok Milena. i was drunk. thats all. gG again nice game..
btw why ur clan is not in pure cup ? ok, u dont like rr bcuz its campy bla bla bla but mbe some other guys from ur clan wanted to play in this cup. it was only ur decission?
It was voted (poll) decision. And now, as I am not drunk, you have this from me >>> . <<< (a.k.a. DOT - end of discussion). GG R2, nice game as always with you.
31. August 2011 - 19:24
#45
United Kingdom
Re: CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
wrote:
It was voted (poll) decision. And now, as I am not drunk, you have this from me >>> . <<< (a.k.a. DOT - end of discussion). GG R2, nice game as always with you.
hard to call it discussion when both sides dont listen, but atleast u won Milena. Person who puts >>> . <<< first is always a winner. FIN
31. August 2011 - 19:41
#46
Re: CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
thank you 
wrote:Okay guys, next time I wanna waste time on a useless topic I'll call you.
21. September 2011 - 11:11
#47
Re: CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
JO.ohnny wrote:
the real Quakers love every aspect and every mod and every cfg of this game, the ones who don't like some of them are just not true fanatics sry
before i didn't liked some of cfg-s but the more i play i'm starting to see every cfg is good in its own way ,so the ones who keep loving and playing only one,two of them are not evolving in this game
No, you are talking nonsense. There are some truly atrocious mods and moronic configs out there. If somebody doesn't like some of them, it's because they're not a total tool like you. I bet you're one of those guys that thought rebounce was playable. Good fucking lord.
21. September 2011 - 11:17
#48
Re: ®CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
who dared to write again in this ridiculous topic ?! xp
21. September 2011 - 12:39
#49
United States
Re: ®CW (FTAG) >>> sNeAkY 2 : 0 r2 / 28.08. 2011
ok mombringer
Shout 08:42:32
: Steff, traitor. That’s a valid message
: Enter a valid Message
: Me, lol
: hello!
: I hope you had a good reason to be absent. Get well soon, my friend.
: Impressive
: I am half Russian and half black. I'm black on the bottom half. Don't forget to lubricate your ass
: ok, bring it on analbolic hohol
: Come tomorrow to watch my battle with ShadyХУЙ at SexyFraggers 8 on central european, 22:00 Moscow time. He said he would win because he was a deft monkey. ХУЙ don't forget to put on makeup, I'll record us on video. You must be beautiful.
: broheim it is oke!!! I saw Moldova elections on the news, and referendum before that. HOPE life will get better (but nothing ever changes)
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 6 guests online.
i said that i hate campers and that style, i talked as clan leader... and one more thing... i remember that we (sneaky) played many FWs with mzi's team (ES) and they never wanted even try railmania, so we always played with them rr or r4e09f, because those "real quakers" didn't even wanted to hear about other cfgs. So he is completely nobody to judge me if i am fan of multyjumps or not... i am so what?!
in this case (related to this thread), sneaky clan was invited by r2 i answered on their proposition (just accepted cfg, gametype, date and time), if mzi consider that i did something bad with that, i am really sorry... so, please, lets stop discuss "no topics" here, because this was nice friendly CW, sneaky and r2 are in friendly relations, leaders and rest players said gg, so mzi if you still want to flame we can continue that shit on MSN or in pm... thank!
p.s. all respects to Atrax who just normaly said "gg" with head up like it's normal and to Roso who a little exaggerated with critics (for r2), but they acted kinda "fair play" as i think that we did when we lost 3 CWs before from r2... i hope that our clans still will be in friendly relations... gg