yes, maybe like e5r style? but with your idea to bring rail ammo down to 4/5 and if you want to rail more you have to collect slug packs..
But the slugs must be added on the amount that u already got.. so not max 5 shots. if i spent 5 minutes on collecting slug packs, i want to have 50 shots
till i get shot, then i start again

might be interesting, maybe u convince some other strict e5r players to play it also..

Absulutly agree with u Magik. But guys shouldnt u talk about this in pm? And im may be not right but i have a feeling that typ u just came here to argue over smg wich doesnt concern u..as u said u were a pure e5r player

you just cant deny that e6 caused a config war, which definitely had influence on wars. i know from experience it was way harder to arrange wars because some clans don't wanted to play e5r anymore because they were hooked on to e6.

Yeah maybe lot of e6 wars but the e5/r wars were seriously decreasing because of e6, and it still does bring problems with it while arranging wars.
Dont understand u guys just ignore this (example: suddenly bnt vs jds is impossible, bnt vs en was impossible, bnt vs fuc was impossible etc.. etc..)

But this is off topic, i will withdraw my presence in this topic so you guys can peacefully discuss about the new e6 again

btw last thing; nice motivation to not include e5r players in this config! good job!
i should prefer to create a config that e5 players, as well e5r players as well e6 players would love, to get everyone together again.

wrote:

so did e5r when it was created about a year before e6. but somehow you dont complain about that one

Because that was in the time i just started playing, so i rolled into e5r.

wrote:

When lot of e6 but less e5/r wars were played, it just shows how much e6 was needed

No, there were enough wars played e5/r only , at least way more then now (it was the only choice) before e6 came in. E6 splitted it.

wrote:

While checking BNT's (rank)wars pls tell me how often they played compromises with e6/e5/e5r mixed. After hardly finding a single one you will notice who's "fault" your problem is

Dont blame the fault to BNT, because u do know that other clans are/were a pity too, to compromise. Including EN.

wrote:

Actually you always were someone who cried rivers when ppl flamed at e5r but still you are one of the top attacking e6 and bringing up cfg flames :!:

Yep thats true, i agree because in my eyes E6 screwed up the community and wars. My opinion, nuff said.

wrote:

never said that!
its just that e5r players wish an insta rail while e5/e6 players do not. in the original e6 creation e5r clans like bnt and wgvd were involved.
but what sense does it make to get settings that e5r players "give it a try" from time to time, while the players who are most likely going to have it as their main cfg feel way less comfortable?

Why not change it so all players COULD enjoy it. Dont you like the idea of one config that fits all? Sure we have to get rid of some settings, and add a few others. People always will like or dislike certain settings. But somewhere there is a way in between. (Hard idea to realise, but its nice if it was possible, and people were actually trying it, and not outcast the e5r side)

im out! :!:

Thx GOD!