Gameconfig-Nameabusing!
Ok.
@hq
I can see that u think easily the things before u write this words, im agree with the majour part of this words, and i dont want to clarify some detayls becasue its not affect to the principal point of this conversation. I just going to ask u to please write good my nick, im not waren or warenman, im warnerman or warner if u like dude.
-----
Well all this can be resumend in 2 thing: mowly ask me in a not polith way to exclude the plus word in the sentece of te name , and i have no problem with this i already said this in this treath, 2. I ask mowly for good manerism. But im seeing that this is a problem for him. in my last post here i told somthing like i really hope a good reaction from mowly to me, after that i received 2 nice nightnmare pm from mowly, calling me idiot (not only to me) and things like that.
I really care all this, but he is pushing me to do nothing with his way to be with me. man u are in poland he in germany me in spain, we 3 dont know each other, but we are here becasue maybe this kind of things are important for us, as u said, ppl express theirselfs and maybe ppl dont know wath really say but ppl is here... and ppl is ppl...
Well after all he and me are making somthing bad, because his work dont give him the right to talk this way to ppl and because my education dont give me the right to do what i think is better with the others work.
So i want to break this circle couse now i know that he wont change and i dont hope any more from him, so i will change temporally the name of the config file, while we can fix our self config. As u can see i was only hoping a good word from him, the name of the config was never a problem for me.
Greetings
im alredy pointed that its gives him right couse u dint folowed attached "license" ']
about nick sry these extendet fonts are unredable for me and im also code u as that in mine head long time ago
Hah, so all of this was a provocation? A test of Mow's character? rotfl... yet another sign how much Warner appreciates and respects Mow and his work, gg.
Why you could not change the cfg name right after Mow's first pm to Zoo_Cft or something is beyond me.
"Madbringer"Quote:BTW, should everything stated in the readme be followed to be allowed to use the config?YES.
I can't believe you guys. You should be grateful Mow decided to make this config public. Instead, you whine because, in return for the right to freely use it, he asks to change it's name, if modified, to something that would not be associated with the original.
Bloody cheek. That's your respect? lol....
Agreed ! :salute:
Now stop this bs. If you change the content of the PLUS cfg plz....just change the name into just ZOO cfg then,how hard can that be, OMFG
"Madbringer"Quote:BTW, should everything stated in the readme be followed to be allowed to use the config?YES.
I can't believe you guys. You should be grateful Mow decided to make this config public. Instead, you whine because, in return for the right to freely use it, he asks to change it's name, if modified, to something that would not be associated with the original.
Bloody cheek. That's your respect? lol....
Agreed ! :salute:
Now stop this bs. If you change the content of the PLUS cfg plz....just change the name into just ZOO cfg then,how hard can that be, OMFG
@hq, well in fact nobody have the right to be rude with others for this case, at least not when he try for the first time, and he in his firts try wasnot polite, maybe someone can see this is a good pm and others not, juts point of view, the fact is , when u talk with other and if u want to obtain better results u have to take as importat thing what other is important, and in this case i was asking many times to ask for in a friendly way. I saw in ur message that u try to understand first my point of view and just for this i decided to change the name, because u tryed to understand me and i feel my self in the commitment to understand u too. U can see a fast response from me about the file name.
@mowly, i just can see that u lost easily the control of ur self and thats all.
1.-u sugestt me that i m a thief when say plus = blabla bla and not warnerman.
What u thought? i wanted to rob ur work? this line was unnecesary more if this was te first pm.
2.-Im not hypocrite just because i have diferent feeling than u in some kind of things
3.- Im not a egoist, i told that u call me idion and I specified not only to me.
4.-Im not an IDIOT.
5.-Im dont tell lies NEVER MAN, i just maybe said hard trues.
6.-Im feel u warning me telling me u dont make any jojes about that, i respect the others word and if u asking me in a good way u will have a fast answer. when u talk with a gentleman U dont need to be hard in ur words to be sure he will get ur point. in this way ur prhase souded more like an Order. Can u understand that? maybe u like ppl talk to u in this way but im not.
7.- The zoo_plus was not just a simple fake warnerman. its not so easy u must think that ppl do thinks in a meditated form.
8.- Maybe all this would not hapened If i saked u to add some changes to the ctf config AND if u just try in a meditated and friendly way.
9.- Maybe I just could obey the "Order" but im not a sheep man.
10.- I know very much ppl who think that u dont know how to say the things, im not the only who ask u for a good manerism, and u know that too. U can start to hear this ppl , it is as important as hear the suggestions of the ppl to add in the configs.
In resume, the name of the file as u can see was not my really problem, i dont hope any more a good reaction from u to me but it will be good. I dont going to tell that i dont care about u, if i tell this i would say a lie.
Think about it, i will be always there if u can talk .
Greetings
Quote:and he in his firts try wasnot polite, maybe someone can see this is a good pm and others not, juts point of viewrofl, point of view? Mine first "PRIVATE" message was neither polite nor impolite, it was factual.
Quote:
@mowly, i just can see that u lost easily the control of ur self and thats all.Yes, I lost the control in my third private message. The reason for that is your Ignorance and self-complacent acts.
Quote:1.-u sugestt me that i m a thief when say plus = blabla bla and not warnerman.
What u thought? i wanted to rob ur work? this line was unnecesary more if this was te first pm.I suggest you? I suggest to change name, that what someone can suggest, or you can suggest a new forumadmin, or u can suggest improvements for plus.cfg but u can't suggest someone to be a thief.
In order to interpret my first PM, that I call you thief, someone must have a lot of fantasy and inventor-spirit.
Quote:2.-Im not hypocrite just because i have diferent feeling than u in some kind of thingsNo, that not, you are hypocritical because you made a mistake, and shift the mistake onto me.
Quote:3.- Im not a egoist, i told that u call me idion and I specified not only to me.If you feel addressed with the plural of Idiots, then that proves that I was just correct.
Quote:4.-Im not an IDIOT.any proves?
Quote:5.-Im dont tell lies NEVER MAN, i just maybe said hard trues.Fact is, I did not call you thief. I did not warn you. Subsequent, You are a liar.
Quote:6.-Im feel u warning me telling me u dont make any jojes about that, i respect the others word and if u asking me in a good way u will have a fast answer. when u talk with a gentleman U dont need to be hard in ur words to be sure he will get ur point. in this way ur prhase souded more like an Order. Can u understand that? maybe u like ppl talk to u in this way but im not.You have the problem that you can not deal with facts. As I wrote above already, I was not either polite or impolite, nor it was not a order nor a command. It was simply only factual. Even after that I declared that more than 1 time how it was was meant, you stay with your sense. Do you know the word constructive? You are the opposite.
Quote:7.- The zoo_plus was not just a simple fake warnerman. its not so easy u must think that ppl do thinks in a meditated form.I do not condemn the config, I condemn you, since the mistake comes from you and not from me. You did not pay attention to the Readme and persist as a donkey onto the GNU-Licensing.
Quote:8.- Maybe all this would not hapened If i saked u to add some changes to the ctf config AND if u just try in a meditated and friendly way.Not maybe, but for sure.
And expect not, that all people put their head in yours ass, because you just think they are supposed to kiss your hand before they speak to you.
If you do not take any functionalism, then you should repeat the second year in the kindergarten. In this time the difference is taught the children in Germany between politeness, inpolitness and functionalism. Ass creeping, however, not.
Quote:9.- Maybe I just could obey the "Order" but im not a sheep man.Any proves ur r not? There was no order. You should enlarge your horizon urgently.
Quote:10.- I know very much ppl who think that u dont know how to say the things, im not the only who ask u for a good manerism, and u know that too. U can start to hear this ppl , it is as important as hear the suggestions of the ppl to add in the configs.Mostly it are people, that have a Big Lid and if one argues against tehy start crying. I can tell you these people by names, maybe as PM? So that you have again a reason to get "nightmares"?
Quote:In resume, the name of the file as u can see was not my really problem, i dont hope any more a good reaction from u to me but it will be good. I dont going to tell that i dont care about u, if i tell this i would say a lie.Here you attempt in a simple way to stand above me. But in the opposite to you, I stand what I said, with all consequences.
Quote:Think about it, i will be always there if u can talk.From me you can become my neighbour, presumable I would not notice .
You always talk about respect. People must earn themself respect. Respect is giving and taking in same pieces. You only took.
Comon, be a man, stand your mistakes, and stop with your thin excuses.
In addition you have offend against the principle of the plus cfg. The plus.cfg is called plus.cfg, because it does nto refer to a clan, person or team.
With the name zoo-plus.cfg the config refers to zoo.
But since you do not read any readmes generally, you can no know that. Ignorance does not protect against punishment.
:
You lie now the 3rd time:
1st lie: I didnt warned you.
2nd lie: And didn't called you thief
This is 1:1 what i wrote you:
The sentence "really, i dont make any jokes" is refering just, that it is highly serious for me.
The next PM from me to you "1:1" after u lied about me calling you thief and warning you:
Instantly following PM after i couldnt stop my anger anymore!
As all can finally c, i dint called you idiot, i spoke in generell. But u r just egoistic and try to defend yourself.
You don't know the words:
- Private
- Readme
- Attention
- Interpretation
@ HQ
Sure, the config is for sharing, otherwise i wouldnt have it in my signature. But stealing names to have success is just bullshit. As i already said, the ctfpart of plus.cfg wasnt perfect, i would have made chanings fast, if the ctf-part of our community would have asked us. And if warner would have asked one of us, this problem wouldnt excist.