wrote:

Quote:

And well, why im not respectfull to use plus?

Because he asked in the readme to change the name of the config if you in any way modified it. Secondly, that if you use a modified config and call it plus, you make ppl believe they are playing the unmodified version. I don't have to tell you this is bad. This, btw, is also in the readme. I can see you haven't taken the time to read it

lol...
if i didnt read the readme, our config still named plus.cfg, cause i read it
i had to renamed to zoo_plus.cfg AND zoo_plus is NOT IQUAL plus.
I decided to keep bouth names cause 1.- i respect their job (same as they/he in the first add a thans to mullder) so i wanted to keep it if i was not respectful i easyly can delet all comments in the files , make my changes make the name and share this conf as ZOO members work config. Now is easy to all know that this config is based on plus, and if any ask me to the confg can see the comments (original ones) and our changes (with comments too) I really insist to all who want to join developer world to read a generic GNU licence to know a little more about the open source world. and 2.- Cause is practic , u can know how style of config u will get, like when u join a excessiver config u know is so similar to excesive5.

And i will tell one more thing i really really dont need to use the config name, im a profesional developer and really know how it works, i did it this way because i think it was the better to all but dont have any problem if mowlly or flex come and ask me in a good and friendly way , warner please can u omit the word plus? on our config file.
but if he send me a pm warning me and telling me things like i dont make jokes, i CANT take this as a friendly way.

so for the momenth the original name was changed as said in the comments files, and it will be this way until i consider things are diferent.

Grettings

oh c'mon guys.

first of all, i dont know if you read it, mad, its name is changed to "zoo_plus.cfg". i already told you why we did that and why we think its the best for every player visiting the server.

second, we (at least have big respect of mow's work for the community by hosting servers, publicing that conf etc etc.

therefore everybody should see where the origin of zoo_plus.cfg with its really ridicolous little changes is and what type of conf is played on this server.

well, we simply thought its name was "changed enough" by adding zoo (which btw indicates ctf-based changes to the conf) to its name. obviously you dont think so. it wasnt meant as "no respect" or as a provocation but as most friendly and easy for every player...

ill go and change the name of the conf later (if warner agrees, but i hope so...).

regards (and hopefully "peace"),
*regel* aka FlyingPenguin

@regel hi dude, definetly u have better english than me and is more easy to u explain which was our intentions about the name, thx to explain it .

Ok, i will do my last try to explain my feelings about this.

as I said before, i dont habe problem to change the name to another, the situation is this:

1.- We renamed the file as it sais in the coments, and we decided to use this name for respect the job of plus conf creators, i mean and is important, we decided this with really GOOD INTENTIONS. Never to rob their work, and because we dont have respect. this is the true.

2.- The first day i get the servers up i received a pm from mowly, i dont like the idea to publish here all the content of pms, so i just going to express the things he told to me and i cant understand:
plus config = mowly , flex , hq and not warnerman. .... change it...
i dont make any jokes. with this 2 sentences he is calling me thief, and warning me about he dont make any jokes.
I dont know which class of ppl he think i am, but i really dont like this way to ask me to change the name, but well i get really impacted after that so i answer him somthing like: i changed the name maybe u miss somthing please be more specific. today i dont have any pm answer to that.

3.- One day i come here and read (using original plus config not that warnerman fake) this is ofessinve directly to me. If as he said he send me a pm and ask me why im including plus in the name, im in a friendly way explain to him and if he prefers to change the name i will doit. Dont know maybe somthing like: Hello Warner (because he neither said hello in this pm)i saw that u recently get up urs servers, hope gl to u and hf with it.
I saw too that u renamed the name plus.cfg to zoo_plus.cfg, i dont know why u decided to make this way but please change it, zoo.cfg or the name what ur team prefer but not includ plus in the sentence.
I promise that i had acted imidiatly in a good way.

So after all this i just have to react, asking a little respect to me, because i did this with good intentions, just that, a little respect and friendly ways to take the things. i dont know others but is very important to me.

I hope this text will be understandable, because i writed with the best intentions to clarify the things and to come ahead with relations.

Im open to change the name, just please taking the things in another way.

@mowly ok i underestand what u explained about mull and u & u and me.
and yes u have true i dont thought in the posibility to ask u for some changes in the config, u know, after all this time u and me never having a good relation, so i suposed u will tell me not. But if u are open to make some changes as u said, i can send it to u in a pm. im open to work in this direction u sugested. But if i try to understand ur points why u never do the same with mines. im not a man who have alwys right, u can read in many many of my post about urs i recongice the points im agree but u never. So try to undertand and i hope u can have another reaction with me.

Greetings

Maybe i mised somthing but i have the impression that this posts /treath was moved to here for any reason... :roll:
do im wrong? i always toght that this conversations was maked as a part of another treath..

Greetings