wrote:

very cool idea +1

says the one who complained about too many cfgs being around

highly doubt the cfg would find a sufficient interest within the community.

I consider weapon movement one of the three most prominently fun features of E+ (the other two being extremely fast pace of the gameplay and simplicity), so removing that from the equation is severely damaging to the concept itself, that's why i think gl as the starting weapon would be the best choice.

Also consider, that would mean weapon movement would actually matter even more than in regular e5 games, you will have to move better than your opponent to grab the weapon you want before him, whereas ordinary e5 only promotes weapon movement as means of outmanouvering people( (which matters little due to spam) except in ctf, where it's crucial to winning).

Last argument i have, without weapon movement, people would need to develop ground movement, and i don't think learning an entirely new skill from scratch will shout 'FUN!' for most people (excluding those who already know how to strafejump).

My comment is only based on CTF.
You start with gl you're pretty much set, fast movement to bfg and as attacker you're set.

Not that i'd play it though, you remove my weapons i'm too lazy to find them.

Invisible, All excessive cfgs were made only by 2 peope:
- cid+
- easy+

So as you see.. make your own conclusions.

What is im tryina say..is that we create 1 uniQ & universaL cfg holding on a few easy rules. For example:

- consult with skilled cfg makers, and not amateurs
- ask for skilled players's opinion, and not the noob ones
- use the cfgs at funwars,duels..different gametypes, to test them, and after a period - make a poll with question: Wich cfg best ? a) or

ps: Poll must involve f.e: atleast 5 different gamestyled players&cfgmakers. For others poll closed.

Also u might wanna read > this < . Try to exclude the main..