®OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1

43 replies [Last post]
JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1
equinox wrote:

are you about to cry now?

zarzyn
zarzyn's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1

go sneaky bastard to your topic.

Happy

equinox
Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts:
US United States
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1
JUMPS'FPS! wrote:

equinox wrote:

are you about to cry now?

You got nothing else to say... Thought so.

alienM
alienM's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1
equinox wrote:

JUMPS'FPS! wrote:
equinox wrote:

are you about to cry now?

You got nothing else to say... Thought so.

Equinox, did you just said to someone "ex cheater". RRR OOO FFF LLL
What then you are, red card banned creature? Happy
Btw, Fps at least has some friends (many of them), not sure that you can say same for you. Also he don't need to say anything else to you, because every spoken word to you is just big waste of time. (which sadly i did now again, but it's nothing new on e+)

JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1
equinox wrote:

JUMPS'FPS! wrote:
equinox wrote:

are you about to cry now?

You got nothing else to say... Thought so.

In case I will feel an interest to talk with some random cheater dude, I will call you back, don't worry Happy

zarzyn
zarzyn's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1
alienM wrote:

because every spoken word to you is just big waste of time.

ok why you answer because for you it is not waist of time
go to your topic .
Place of failmania+ noobs clan +real life ( Happy )
you can start closing this topic Tongue

Happy

alienM
alienM's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1
zarzyn wrote:

noobs clan

Want CW? When you want get free points on this poor sneaky noobs?

epsiplayer
THE ONE AND ONLY
intact-epsilon's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1

I'm sorry for the situation with SP here, its my mistake to not discuss with him also related on equinox question.
Equinox pmed me, seeing that the verdict was called as not final, to know if he can play in cws.
And because i didn't knew i questioned a part of the rank mods, sadly because i had alot of work @my workplace this week, i was unable to speak with SP . Therefor i took the liberty after a while, to pass the response known to equinox. Which is that he is allowed to play, since the verdict is no more final. That's all, and that's why it was my mistake.

equinox wrote:

That doesn't mean that equinox won't be judged by the forum rules.
I'm waiting for the final verdict.

Rank mods have full independence on their decisions. And i'm not trying to influence them in anyway. The only thing i have to do as an path opener for new moderators is to advice them on the existing tools and how be unbiased, fair and a team.
_________
epsislow


eu.jeff
jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1

The fact that he posted it on forum is generally a offence against the rank rules... and not about "some" people dont like him because he's a forum troll...

If you figure out logical thinking pls post again Winking

JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: OSRC3 / Round 2 / LoVe vs *IS 2:1

Equinox could be called even an average player, but a stretch. I don't think that the clan will lose something in case he would be banned for using cheats.

Important the fact how in the past, you never were telling me how do judge any situations related to the rank side, but now we saw a clear statement from the rank team, and in pm you are telling him the opposite things, like you are the head judge.

However, I got the answer I requested, thx.

edit:

epsiplayer wrote:
Rank mods have full independence on their decisions. And i'm not trying to influence them in anyway. The only thing i have to do as an path opener for new moderators is to advice them on the existing tools and how be unbiased, fair and a team.

You added that text after I wrote this post, but yes, you got what I mean. Hope so.