User login
perfect sensitivity v2
7. February 2011 - 16:20
#12
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
zapodal bys opis w jezyku polski bo wagarowicze jak ja nie kapuja calosci 
Histroy :
PLUS = FOX Clan >> GSE Clan >> BBS Clan >> KTM Clan >> BURN* Clan >> BBSquad Clan >> MR Clan >> VENDETTA Clan >> OUT of gaming 
RAIL = DUNNO Clan >> OF Clan >> PW Clan >> OUT of gaming
7. February 2011 - 18:18
#13
Germany
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
hm, not bad - but it doesn't change a damn thing for me
anyways, why v2?
7. February 2011 - 18:31
#14
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
wrote:anyways, why v2?
because in the past it was another post called "perfect sensitivity" and now it's v2 
___________
epsislow
7. February 2011 - 18:40
#15
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
epsi failed on task, he is not so smart like i thought :} and can't put scripts in oo so the calculator missing one feature witch would optimize the sensitivity even more than it is :}
7. February 2011 - 19:10
#16
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
This works with all Microsoft Office releases. Thank you epsi <3 
7. February 2011 - 19:50
#17
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
yup...poor epsik i still remember that night when fala started to talk about all this...and epsik get involved on this :DDD was funny to watch
dunno for me works all fine , and i think i found my sensitivity just need to get used to it now and train it a bit and all will be O K 
thx fala and peps:)
Gloria Mōmentum
“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”
“There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter.”
—Ernest Hemingway
7. February 2011 - 20:21
#18
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
well.. I have done some calculations and found out that:
PP360 = width * 360 * cos(cg_fov/2) / cg_fov
and consequently
pixelwise m_yaw = cg_fov / ( width * cos(cg_fov/2) )
so we have for
cg_fov = 60 : PP360 = 5320.86, m_yaw = 0.06766
cg_fov = 90 : PP360 = 2896.31, m_yaw = 0.1243
cg_fov = 105: PP360 = 2137.27, m_yaw = 0.1684
cg_fov = 120: PP360 = 1536, m_yaw = 0.2344
______________________________
You can try it with these simple ruler maps (att) built for width = 1024. With right fov you will see the circular ruler with 2px pins and 6px spacers (8px total step). With right m_yaw you will have exactly 8 VA per ruler step. Try (8 * m_yaw) and you will get a whole step for single VA:
mapname fov60: cg_fov = 60, m_yaw = 0.5413 (
)
mapname fov90: cg_fov = 90, m_yaw = 0.9944 ()
mapname fov105: cg_fov = 105, m_yaw = 1.3475 ()
mapname fov120: cg_fov = 120, m_yaw = 1.875 ()
Do not move, just turn around. (sensitivity = 1, in_mouse = 1)
edit: if you do a full turn, then your crosshair will not be centered against ruler pins because of non-integral amount of VA per turn. Reload map or turn back if that happened.
7. February 2011 - 21:08
#19
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
well actualy i have a xls that is working with that task but you didnt wanted to release in xls so ppl are converting into xls just to open it
so in a way it means that the feature is not present cause you wanted it to be in open format which noone has it installed so i didnt failed anything .. u failed it cause it works on xls but wanted to use openoffice that has bugs ^_^
_________
epsislow
7. February 2011 - 23:54
#20
Re: perfect sensitivity v2
i think the world own u one
till now i have used this formula:
R = ( pi * W ) / ( I * tan[ F / 2 ] ) where W = screen resolution width I = real sensitivity (distance per 360 turn) F = horizontal fov R = mouse resolution required
this is injx formula (a guy from ESReality)
let me triple check i think i have messed something up
@epsi, stfu u nab, how i cloud know everyone use pirate ms office... :}
yeah it seems injx was wrong about
Shout 02:18:58
: Steff, traitor. That’s a valid message
: Enter a valid Message
: Me, lol
: hello!
: I hope you had a good reason to be absent. Get well soon, my friend.
: Impressive
: I am half Russian and half black. I'm black on the bottom half. Don't forget to lubricate your ass
: ok, bring it on analbolic hohol
: Come tomorrow to watch my battle with ShadyХУЙ at SexyFraggers 8 on central european, 22:00 Moscow time. He said he would win because he was a deft monkey. ХУЙ don't forget to put on makeup, I'll record us on video. You must be beautiful.
: broheim it is oke!!! I saw Moldova elections on the news, and referendum before that. HOPE life will get better (but nothing ever changes)
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 10 guests online.
nope, the view angles in fov does not have even distance between them, thats why it is related to fov and circle length, flattering the pov makes the net of VA uneven
if we would looking at the pov like it would be a curve (part of the circle) then the distance between VA would have the same distance, but since we looking on the flattered circle the VA on the center have bigger density that those on the screen borders
the amount of VA is based on the circle length not the resolution, the calculation is connected to screen width to help determinate the minimal VA amount that will guaranties no pixel skipping, but in reality there is none connection between them
I am addicted to life.