wrote:

wrote:

If
they ban a member, they "must" create an extra topic with valuable
reasons (done by mods of the past, nowadays completly
ignored).

Point me out a forum where is a topic with explenation
why and who get banned? Because i know none ;/

BTW. U also have
said people know for what they got banned and for what they have get
warned. If they know it why every onlooker demands an
explenation?

For me it looks like many people have no idea why they were warned or banned.

And yeah, in the olden days, people knew exactly who and why was banned. It didn't warrant a special thread, but reasons were always given by the powers that be. Also, all of this is extremely arbitrary and reeks of nothing more than a childish display of power and getting back at people who are not liked by the administrative body.

I'll use two small examples, recent events that involved me:

I create a blog about Ali. I didn't insult him once in it. It gets deleted mere hours later.

Ultra creates a blog about me and Tem. He soon drops the mask and starts throwing shit right in our faces. It gets deleted 7 days later, and only because i drew the comparison.

I got banned for a week, for insulting Ultra. Didn't even get a warning.

Ultra got 1/3 warning for insulting me and Tem.

You read my blog and immediately got personal with me, going back to the beer thing for no apparent reason at all, completely ignoring the context and content of my blog post. You also don't hesitate to point out it breaks forum rules.

You read Ultra's blog and immediately get on his cock and start rambling on how tired you are of us, how the mods are doing a great job, how we're evil, blah blah blah. You never once mention that his blog breaks forum rules.

*sniff* *sniff*

Smell that? That's right, it's pure, unadulterated bullshit. And lots of it, my friend.

Some are liked more some less, and even if we going try as bad we can to be unbiased some uneven examples going to occur. Aha excuse me but i also do wonder why those people who clearly did broken the rules demands justify for others? They like to be treat the same way like others when they don't treat people even by themselves? They like to refer to the rules if they get penalty for rules breaking? While short time before they have spit in Admins/Mods faces and wiped their ass off by the rules?

BTW. Administrator can't read all, if u see something bad happening u can inform Moderator/Admin about there for sure actions going to be taken. It is not necessarily must be like that someone didn't treat people even.

wrote:

Some are liked more some less, and even if we going try as bad we can to be unbiased some uneven examples going to occur. Aha excuse me but i also do wonder why those people who clearly did broken the rules demands justify for others? They like to be treat the same way like others when they don't treat people even by themselves? They like to refer to the rules if they get penalty for rules breaking? While short time before they have spit in Admins/Mods faces and wiped their ass off by the rules?

BTW. Administrator can't read all, if u see something bad happening u can inform Moderator/Admin about there for sure actions going to be taken. It is not necessarily must be like that someone didn't treat people even.

Remember what was the major requirement to get into KO back in the day? You always said it yourself...HAVE BALLS. Where the fuck have yours gone? You sound like a scared pussy hiding behind illogical reasoning when you should just step up, be a man and admit you're completely biased against "Tem and his posse".

You sad power ranger you.

@Mad, Trance; u might like to think that way, and yeah i don't like U Trance but actually somehow... and it is hard to explain... but i do like Mad... all thought he thinks all opposite, can't blame none for having their opinions even if they are far from reality...

@Trance, no it was not "to have balls" but to be polite and showing respect for every other player not only KO crew, i know exactly what it was because i had wrote those rules myself.

@Mad, if u will find the post ill give u a warn and hopefully u will be satisfied with the justice

wrote:

Impius, do not judge for yourself. My work is to look at Europe, I am well aware of how and what you have because the technology we take from you. In Russia the Internet is now working on those technologies that you have had 5-7 years ago.

The whole of Russia except Moscow (In St. Petersburg is still not all areas generally have access to the Internet than dial-up 33kb and this is city is the second largest in the country) - ghetto ))

There are various places in my parents neighbourhood where it's impossible to get cable internet because the lines don't run near. And thats only my neighbourhood, not the city! Its why the leading cable ISP in the UK also offers ADSL net, because they know that every village/town cannot not gain good internet.