i am f2,
for the simple fact that this will create more inactivity for the players that will get out from the clan before the transfer window. More inactivity = smaller active community = less players in clan wars = more clans will close and wont be able to create new clan unless its in the transfer window = less clans participating in competitions.. do we want this?

If the clans think they can survive after random quits, until the transfer window they might be wrong.

i feel that this here is not so good.. Its a Big Risk and might cost every1.

Creating the system for a professional scene how you say, its never a problem, the problem is having the players who are willing to dedicate their time to continue the saga, and not quit on the first sign of trouble/ inactivity. We don't offer money so how can we motivate ppl to stay and train while being clanless? If they are not motivated they will leave or not play until the window transfer, resulting in loss of practice which its bad. This Risky move with a transfer window might cost us more then we think.

Do we want this?
_________
epsislow

wrote:

f2
Im against things like that.

If everything goes well, why do we have to change it?
If we have no issues, we dont have to create problems by our own.

A lot of clanhoppers? Not realy? Who cares anyway?

I thought ranking moderator should be all about FAIR. Is it fair for a clan to recruit strong players just before the next CW? There is a good recent example in the CTF cup: DA lost in the cup and Dynio joined Vendetta in order to help them win the cup. Dynio isn't the best attacker there is, but still is that fair? What if they also recruit some other players and completely change their lineup, will it still be the same clan which signed up for the cup? It has not always been like that. Some time ago the new players had to wait 3 CW's before they could participate....or in some events it has even been more strict, you sign up with a lineup of players of your clan and you can't make any changes during the event. That's what I call fair.

wrote:

This transfer window was my idea and it's linked with my old account, they didn't agree so I am showing them now how it works ;] Are you afraid?

Not at all, I'm disappointed

wrote:

wrote:

I thought ranking moderator

I wasn't appointed to rank moder at time this post were writen. However, I agreed with skull while this suggestion has been made and still holding my opinion, this won't be implemented.

Hehe, I don't care about implementing anything, I just find it weird you can't see it might be unfair..maybe I should join HD for one game vs Jumps and then quickly hop back to BAC for the game vs Vendetta, then you might understand that it CAN be unfair.

wrote:

Hehe, I don't care about implementing anything, I just find it weird you can't see it might be unfair..maybe I should join HD for one game vs Jumps and then quickly hop back to BAC for the game vs Vendetta, then you might understand that it CAN be unfair.

nope you can't because you have to wait one round like me, so if you want to play one match for HD you have to wait one round and then comeback to BAC and wait one round also.