wrote:

wrote:

Hehe, I don't care about implementing anything, I just find it weird you can't see it might be unfair..maybe I should join HD for one game vs Jumps and then quickly hop back to BAC for the game vs Vendetta, then you might understand that it CAN be unfair.

nope you can't because you have to wait one round like me, so if you want to play one match for HD you have to wait one round and then comeback to BAC and wait one round also.

But where can I find this rule about waiting one round?

The waiting rule is part of an organized event rules.

There are a lot of events, events can have different waiting rules set up. If an organizer is doesn't want to have this rule in one event, is his choice to do so .. and also its the clans choice to sign in to that event. Signing in to an event is by default an act of acceptance for the rules of that event.

An organizer can chose if the event he want to create will have ranked matches or not by adding in the event rules that all games will be ranked (meaning all the e+ ranking rules need to be obeyed for games to be ranked).

E+ Ranking moderators purpose on events is to rank the games (adding them the ranking lists) if those games respect the e+ ranking rules. (Not the events rules)

If an waiting rule is broken only the organizer can choose if the result will be added in the event's progress or if a rematch/W.O will be needed ..

The waiting rule is not part of the e+ ranking rules.
Therefor if there is the case that a waiting rule was broken => speak with the event's organizers.
If there are problems with the e+ ranking rules speak with the ranking moderators.

P.S. The waiting rule is different then the Transfer Window Idea presented in this Topic. My opinion related to the Transfer Window Idea remains the same : http://www.excessiveplus.net/forums/thread/transfer-window?page=2

P.S.2 There mustn't be considered a fair-play problem if all clans accepted the rules of the event they took part in and a rule in the event like the waiting rule just doesn't exist on that event. All clans accepted the event when they signed in. If the clans have an issue with the rules and the event started: that means they blindly signed in to that event => good luck walking like that.
____________
EpsisLOW

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

Hehe, I don't care about implementing anything, I just find it weird you can't see it might be unfair..maybe I should join HD for one game vs Jumps and then quickly hop back to BAC for the game vs Vendetta, then you might understand that it CAN be unfair.

nope you can't because you have to wait one round like me, so if you want to play one match for HD you have to wait one round and then comeback to BAC and wait one round also.

But where can I find this rule about waiting one round?

There is no such rule in this event, so actually it means - you can join another clan after you being kicked out of looser bracket. While I was writing this cup rules, I was using a minimal requirments, because I knew - it would be hard to get 8 intersted clans having enough players in summer time.

There was actually a rule about players who leaves their clans meanwhile the cup cant play on the event. Is it deleted now?

wrote:

wrote:

There are most players left their main clan and recreated BAC and it hasn't become a problem for anyone - but it still can be called clanhoping.

exactly

Well, one thing is signing up with a starting squad which you don't change and another is to recruit players in the middle of the event. You should all understand one thing...I don't want to change the rules NOW, the event has started and we accepted the rules as they are..all I want to point out is that next time there should be such a rule in order to keep fair play.And you, Dynio, told me that you created this event for the honor of DA and you were going to quit quake after the cup, but now that DA is out of the cup, you quit your clan and join another. FPS was right talking about player's reputation.

This should be event rule no matter what..