[Closed] DFEngine

15 replies [Last post]
10. September 2010 - 12:47
#11
D e c e m b e r
Developer
brb24hours's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] DFEngine
Cyrax wrote:

D e c e m b e r wrote:
The primary goal is still having a full server Winking And so goes the world that you either need a community that follows your upgrades, or you must service strangers with their just basic games.

Did you interested in client updates?

I meant that noone is interested except people that are on orbits around you. Look distributing the client update is the same problem as offering new maps to download. First you have somehow to get people to install your update and just then they can use all improvements like fast downloads. But I think if we have a way to distribute, then we can simply skip updating step and get people to download maps that way.

Top
10. September 2010 - 14:14
#12
Cyrax
Offline
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] DFEngine

Your method can be implemented in addition with client-side update, however as long as there is no sources/patch of it - it gives advantages only for your servers atm. While client-side update gives advantages to all clients and do not have yours mentioned disadvantages (potential lags or so). Plus updated client is much more stable/secure, have faster/smoother renderer, have fixed mouse input(+raw+overflow prevention in my modification), plus many things that you obviously can't provide on server side.

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

Top
10. September 2010 - 14:29
#13
D e c e m b e r
Developer
brb24hours's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] DFEngine

Ohm I guess we are talking about different things... I personally do not like those advantages that need you to have some sixth sense to enjoy them. For me the only thing is worth to do is that makes players stick to your server for long time. And it is obviously not that you are talking about...

Top
10. September 2010 - 14:35
#14
Cyrax
Offline
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] DFEngine

Topic directly points on client-side update if so Winking Also there is no need in sixth sense to feel 500/1000Hz usb pollrate bugs or 3rd eye to see gfx issues or game crashes Happy

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

Top
10. September 2010 - 17:08
#15
=ANU815=
outeris's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
Re: [Suggestion] DFEngine
D e c e m b e r wrote:

Cyrax wrote:
D e c e m b e r wrote:
The primary goal is still having a full server Winking And so goes the world that you either need a community that follows your upgrades, or you must service strangers with their just basic games.

Did you interested in client updates?

I meant that noone is interested except people that are on orbits around you. Look distributing the client update is the same problem as offering new maps to download. First you have somehow to get people to install your update and just then they can use all improvements like fast downloads. But I think if we have a way to distribute, then we can simply skip updating step and get people to download maps that way.

add and make visely, excessiveplus v2.2, and problem solved, e+ even beter again, ofc if that not makes any problms with say standart q3 versions as now all using

The majority of people think they think, when really they just change their prejudices. Understanding is a matter of will in most cases.

☻ Lietuvių excessiveplus draugija - Lithuanians National Team
☺ Linux (1st E17+Compiz powered ! Built on Debian GNU/Linux.)

MODDB.com all cool things for Quake III Arena @ one place from E+


Top