User login
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
28. September 2008 - 20:33
#11
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
in for offence
28. September 2008 - 21:50
#13
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
count me in at off,
liking the idea kpax 
28. September 2008 - 21:52
#14
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
in for def community service :bounce:
28. September 2008 - 23:03
#15
![S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]](/files/screenname/fb48bf71f868792b4724881a0b7912c5.webp "S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]"){kind=small}
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
wrote:Thats a nice idea KB thanks for the input. A mid guy... in that respect it can be 3 defenders/midman on all maps. Where there are 2 on base and one on mid. I guess this is a more realistic scenario for an offender.
you misread my post... I was talking about supporting the offender to not let the def interfere in middle^^
but since you clearly said defs may not act outside their base then you wont need that. so nvm :roll:
that idea of limiting the def to their own base is prolly not realistic but will suit your aim of having some nice capping flow!
else if you let 3 good ctf players def anywhere between their flag and the entrance of the offender's base, the offender barely gets 1-2 caps on most maps 
that would be more realistic tho, seeing that in a match between 2 closely skilled teams there are about 10 +/-5 flags on those maps within 20min, while each team got 2 offenders... but that would make most cappers desperate^^.. also hard to rate then if just 2 offenders made it to cap a flag at all 
I think that does not hit your original vision of the cup 
28. September 2008 - 23:45
#16
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
will read the thread properly tomorrow... but for now i want to sign in as defender (depending on issues of day/time/other)
29. September 2008 - 11:33
#17
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
Count me in off very nice idea kpa, i luv ya XD
29. September 2008 - 11:41
#18
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
Why so standart and lame maps?
29. September 2008 - 12:58
#19
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
wrote:Why so standart and lame maps?
Why not?
Nothing is impossible
29. September 2008 - 14:02
#20
CTF Cappers Cup 2008
|pGv|AbarTh wrote:
Why so standart and lame maps?Why not?
moron
Shout 06:14:21
: Steff, traitor. That’s a valid message
: Enter a valid Message
: Me, lol
: hello!
: I hope you had a good reason to be absent. Get well soon, my friend.
: Impressive
: I am half Russian and half black. I'm black on the bottom half. Don't forget to lubricate your ass
: ok, bring it on analbolic hohol
: Come tomorrow to watch my battle with ShadyХУЙ at SexyFraggers 8 on central european, 22:00 Moscow time. He said he would win because he was a deft monkey. ХУЙ don't forget to put on makeup, I'll record us on video. You must be beautiful.
: broheim it is oke!!! I saw Moldova elections on the news, and referendum before that. HOPE life will get better (but nothing ever changes)
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 38 guests online.
Thats a nice idea KB thanks for the input. A mid guy... in that respect it can be 3 defenders/midman on all maps. Where there are 2 on base and one on mid. I guess this is a more realistic scenario for an offender.
I agree its impossible to make it 100% fair. I think the thing to aim for is the same defenders/mid man on each map. As you metnioned, people signing up will be aware of how it works.
If we have enough defenders, they can be assigned a map (or maps) they will def.