Lakerman case

314 replies [Last post]
mistress
mistress's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
Lakerman case
sa wrote:

Nolte009 wrote:
i told u to play or go cuz server was full... ffs. all saw it too. as for anyone calling u a cheater, i saw none. i saw u talking to HELLO, and that was it. stop the lies dude. it's pathetic.

well im not but it was to late time to server be full most euro ppl sleep at 12 and there was another 1 spect ,look i dont wanna fight with u ,i dont have problems with ,but i want u to know its bad for reputation and u saw what u did to me

i followed server admin rules. simple as that. nothing more happened, and once again...... there are server logs to prove anything u wanna deny here. but it's like u wanna make a fool out of urself, so go ahead... i am done with this lol.

eu.jeff
jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
Lakerman case

lulzors!

ive got kicked to once Cool

sa
Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts:
Lakerman case
Nolte009 wrote:

sa wrote:
Nolte009 wrote:
i told u to play or go cuz server was full... ffs. all saw it too. as for anyone calling u a cheater, i saw none. i saw u talking to HELLO, and that was it. stop the lies dude. it's pathetic.

well im not but it was to late time to server be full most euro ppl sleep at 12 and there was another 1 spect ,look i dont wanna fight with u ,i dont have problems with ,but i want u to know its bad for reputation and u saw what u did to me

i followed server admin rules. simple as that. nothing more happened, and once again...... there are server logs to prove anything u wanna deny here. but it's like u wanna make a fool out of urself, so go ahead... i am done with this lol.

i dont wanna make a fool of my self ,i dont even know u

█< *DAVIDSON
Shwarovisky's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts:
Lakerman case

first of all , i wanna thank ones in charge .
about cheat case , looks like they want us to admit cheat to be the end , actually , all plasma things from james was just acting our style , im such a good player when i have a mood to play , and i think u mustn't loose the chance to watch me playing live , to learn what u cant understand

And about mistress case , i dont see nothing else personal things , cause she don't focus on cheat case .

Thanks all.

lagstard
Developer (retired)
rabusmar's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts:
Lakerman case

Sorry skull, i dont agree with you. I've seen the demos you posted with care. I might not be too skilled, however, i think i have good analysing capabilities to give opinions. Also, i'm not supporting anyone blindly, and i actually can't say if they cheat or they don't, i'm just giving you pretty reasonable logical explanations to the "proof" you have encountered, and i'm telling you that all that "evidence" is circumstantial and that it is not enough to declare them guilty. Imo you watch the demos with the wrong premise, assuming that they are cheaters and trying to look for any proof, even the tiniest ones to backup your beliefs.

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

first of all, all enemys he hit with rail his rail is NEVER in the middle, even if there is an enemy crouching on the ground he just hits the edge of enemy (risky way) instead of the middle (safe way) eventhough he has tons of time to aim.

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/4960/shot0097.jpg

That is very difficult to prove in these cases skull, because of their ping. Their ping is never less than 150, so what looks for us like shots in the corner with zero ping that is actually not the case.

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

however his reactions are impossible too:

first moment he should recognise him:
http://img10.imageshack.us/i/shot0105f.jpg/
and a straight rocket:
http://img94.imageshack.us/i/shot0104.jpg/

Again skull, if you apply the player ping (around 150) on that shot you will notice that his crosshair wasn't actually over the player, it was ahead.

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

but most clear its in this situation:
this plasma is due to weapon switch -> fine
http://img210.imageshack.us/i/shot0090.jpg/
here he crosses the hitbox -> fine
http://img697.imageshack.us/i/shot0092.jpg/
and fires a plasma while doing a 180 completly out of firerythm (plasma in plusn has around 120 msec reload, before and after he did have more then 200 msec to fire, look it up in demo if u dont belive
http://img251.imageshack.us/i/shot0093.jpg/

If you see that demo you will notice that they were just messing up playing with plasma in that moment. In the moment of your "proof", he was just messing up shooting in that place, where he suddenly listened the enemy and he reacted fast by flicking the plasma, which is perfectly explainable because most of the time you have the rail (or bfg in closed rooms) and when you are surprised when you are distracted its preferable to flick a shot hoping a lucky shot instead of wasting precious msec aiming and being dead. Also, if you watch closely, the plasma is not directed in the exact position where the enemy was, it missed the hitbox by a reasonable distance.

rUnThEoN?! wrote:

btw, the reason why the autoshoot aint obvious anymore is thx to wasp.beast imo.

due to new netcode, shoots are just recognised every keyframe in demo, since its dok server, u just have a keyframe every 50 msec.

actually u would need to find a shoot exactly on a keyframe to have the autoshoot look exactly like autoshoot, couldnt find one exactly, but one with 3-4 msec delay towards a keyframe:
http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/7092/shot0103u.jpg

That has nothing to do with netcode, its just sv_fps set to low values like 20. Also, it is not obvious because they are not autoshooting Happy

--

Another strong argument to backup the fact they are not cheaters is their consistence, and you cannot deny it. They always shoot the rail with the right timing (they aim more time whey they have time, that's normal), and also they flick their shots pretty often, but for all the shots they make, they all look pretty natural. With the last i mean that the movement of the wrist and the action of the finger clicking the shoot button is always noticeable, even when they are aiming, and you skull that have more time busting cheaters than me knows perfectly that the absence of those natural movements are a key factor in saying if a player autoshots or not.

Yet another argument is the fact that their rail accuracy is not very impressive, and in the demos it doesn't appear any moment when they miss on purpose.

And lastly, you said that they reaction time was impossible and presented a couple of (really far-fetched and controversial) moments, but for those couple of moments that you presented in the demo you can watch several others when the enemy appears from corners and even when their crosshairs are exactly over them they don't shoot them. I know that a cheat can be enabled/disabled, but i dont think they can be that flexible from a second to the other one.

Había una vez un barco chiquito...

Leito
-Leito-'s picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts:
Lakerman case

First want make cheaters from "Jordan" then make them fool. SHAME.
Also at real we everyone can spec anyone 24/24 and make someone cheater and post here some screens/demos which LOOKS LIKE cheat even if somebody doesn't cheat. Someone is bored playing so that's great oportunity to make some action but on forum.

Seth
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
Lakerman case
Nolte009 wrote:

and i dont do anything besides sit there

Stop speccing all the time, it's making me nervous ='[

RONiN wrote:

lol@sethy ur too funny man... if i was a woman, you would make me horny.

rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Lakerman case
lagstard wrote:

Sorry skull, i dont agree with you.

i knew this before i posted.

lagstard wrote:

I've seen the demos you posted with care. I might not be too skilled, however, i think i have good analysing capabilities to give opinions. Also, i'm not supporting anyone blindly, and i actually can't say if they cheat or they don't, i'm just giving you pretty reasonable logical explanations to the "proof" you have encountered, and i'm telling you that all that "evidence" is circumstantial and that it is not enough to declare them guilty. Imo you watch the demos with the wrong premise, assuming that they are cheaters and trying to look for any proof, even the tiniest ones to backup your beliefs.

i apprececiate ur way of actually trying to proof me that im wrong.

lagstard wrote:


That is very difficult to prove in these cases skull, because of their ping. Their ping is never less than 150, so what looks for us like shots in the corner with zero ping that is actually not the case.

as i said, i cared about ping, in fact, the enemy in the first situation was crouching around slowly for at least 300+ msec.
even more funny i find the fact that his crosshair goes left first then just to bump of the wall onto the enemy. (but that might be netcode based though).
oh and, before u wonder, the shoot is exactly on the hitbox x)
http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/2434/shot0115.jpg

lagstard wrote:

Again skull, if you apply the player ping (around 150) on that shot you will notice that his crosshair wasn't actually over the player, it was ahead.

code us demos which would give out server sight. (as defrag servers use it already combinated with an demo analysing anti cheat system)

lagstard wrote:

If you see that demo you will notice that they were just messing up playing with plasma in that moment. In the moment of your "proof", he was just messing up shooting in that place, where he suddenly listened the enemy and he reacted fast by flicking the plasma, which is perfectly explainable because most of the time you have the rail (or bfg in closed rooms) and when you are surprised when you are distracted its preferable to flick a shot hoping a lucky shot instead of wasting precious msec aiming and being dead. Also, if you watch closely, the plasma is not directed in the exact position where the enemy was, it missed the hitbox by a reasonable distance.

ok, how big are the odds for that, lets see hmm...

at 240 he sees him first (note, not recognise, actually we are talking about that a gamer can go down to 130 msec if his whole screen flashes green), at around 300 he crosses the hitbox and fires a plasma at 350 (eventhough its already pinglate)

so yea, the only reason why this wouldnt be a moneyshot is simple because he uses plasma instead of rail? since plasma needs it way to fly so it doesnt hit?

oh and, before u wonder, also here his mouse starts behaving odd, after the nadejump, out of sudden it changes direction during the right move high to move just right at 150 like as if it would have bumped into a invisible limit.

lagstard wrote:


That has nothing to do with netcode, its just sv_fps set to low values like 20. Also, it is not obvious because they are not autoshooting Happy

will proove the opposite later today Tongue

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

XF1GHTER.SWE
XF1GHTER's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
Lakerman case
Nolte009 wrote:

James wrote:
Btw, I forgot something :PPPP My monitor went down earlier and I'm sick of losing due to bad monitors and mice. To be frank, I might quit before you even decide wether I cheat or not Happy but it also is bad for my reputation. Just think wisely next time. And mistress, stop hating me, us dumb Chatterbox And concerning my brother and my cousin, they hate you coz you make them hate you. Not to mention unreasonable kicks.

i never kicked them, PUNKBUSTER DID. and i dont do anything besides sit there & listen to them saying americans suck & blabla. I was being overly fair imo. and yet, u wanna make me look like bad guy? beer can check logs if u dont believe me Tongue

Good Miss! Continue whit ENABLE the PB its good! and dont listen to the other faks that try 2 talk lots off shiat!

Regardz
ImpreZyve

Skype:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKcseix0LwXD_y762mDB00g
https://www.facebook.com/xf1ghter
http://instagram.com/xf1ghterhttps://twitter.com/xf1ghter_
http://steamcommunity.com/id/xf1ghter_
http://www.quakelive.com/#!profile/summary/xf1ghter

animalchik
fala.q3's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts:
Lakerman case

tell me what u see?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxW167pOs5M

don't mind me the title, it has nothjing to do with people inside this clip, just find it somehow funny Winking

I am addicted to life.