Yes Fala, You showed a good point and you right, they ignored you.

But i meant all this situation. Some good points for offence and defence them.
All what i know is that it isn't clear as on beggining.
They are banned but now we (or only don't know if right at all?
I understand that it's not OUR bussines, but in THIS situation is it good let it be as is at the moment?
Propably we won't know if they were cheaters or no, so thats why in my opinion it was just a sacrifice for fun, for kill boring time on this forum.
That was a great show with happy end for forum (finally insults!! yeeaah game over cheaters... :roll: )

wrote:

i asked u guys to find me these edge shots in 3 demos that i have posted did u find anything like that in these demos? u didn't even tried doing that... so why i should care about u?

I already explained them. If you see the demo with the demo buffer (and even the video by camel) you will notice that only 2 of the shots are edge shots, all other just look like it. Even Dee has the same opinion, and he is also a developer. Also, several of the edge shots provided by skull doesnt look like it when you see it with the demo buffer.

wrote:

ps: i looked up the plasma thingy, its very interesting to see it with those box, since he just his the corner of the hitbox and fires.

I already explained it too, it was a (lucky) reflex shot (btw, it can't be much appreciated in the demo because of the low sv_fps, but it appears you're right, the crosshair did was over the player). The reason why he only shot once was because instinctively thought he had the railgun instead of the plasmagun (because he was messing up with that weapon in that occasion).

wrote:

pps: never forgett these boxes are a bit off too

The boxes are actually not off. I mean, for sure they look like that, but thats because thats the way the q3 engine behaves. Player models are often not representative of the real hitbox, which is the cause for most inconsistencies with railgun shots.

wrote:

the demo buffer itself works fine, but its as precise as stable the ping is within 5 seconds.

Thats only when demo recorded with /startmvd or /startrecord. Demos provided by mistress are all recorded with /record, so there are no automatic scoreboard updates, and the scoreboard (and the ping information) its updated only when its killed or when the recorded pressed the scores button (which was almost never).

wrote:

on another note i got no idea how it behaves with demos taking from spectating the player rather then a demo of the player itself.

Demos are recorded using the snapshots sent by the server, so its the same if you record the demo yourself or another person does.

--

Ok, something directed to the jordan guys: are you brainless morons or something? I told you to behave and base your posts on facts and proof instead of insulting and spamming. You are just behaving exactly as a cheater would be. I know that you are upset because you have been banned for several servers, but you just have to accept it for the moment because james already screwed up when he admitted to have cheats on his computer, so all of you are no longer innocent. If you can clear your name up then server owners will probably unban you (tho if i were one of them i would doubt in doing so by the way you are behaving).

PS: This thread should be seriously cleaned.

PS2: If you are using the demo buffer and later when you are playing are kicked from a server with the message "You can't use this binary for playing!", just run the command /seta vm_cgame 2, and then /reconnect to the server. Sorry for that .

yak yak yak
impius try to behave
u r going wrong way again.

relax, take it easy, don't give a shit, laugh more,
anger is no good.

wrote:

I am just pissed at the people who are able to read, but not to comprehend, who are turning arround the words of others to their needs.

you r right, i am out, they are / this is, not worth of my attention.

Relax, those guys are not worth of yours and our nerves. They just can't stand the fact they are caught and behave like little children, which probably, they are....

wrote:

Well, the problem is that they are already banned everywhere, but not because there was any solid evidence at all, but because james said that he has cheats on his computer (but that didn't used them).