[POLL] Gaming monitor 4K or 144Hz?
wrote:wrote:noone asked you to explain anythingufas did so go back to kitchen
you missunderstood me , let me rephrase , noone asked YOU to explain
none asked u to go out of the kitchen
again u missed the point, i asked about mouse input lag, not ghosting or screen tearing. And u mix ghosting and screen tearing all the time lolo
again u missed the point, i asked about mouse input lag, not ghosting or screen tearing. And u mix ghosting and screen tearing all the time lolo
u asked nothing, u answered ufas u dunno a fuck bout gsync n vsync, i explained about mouse input lag, ghosting, tearing and much more details related to that since ufas asked, so i replayed to both of u. im mixing nothing, suck my balls n go sleep.
gotta love e+ forums
lolo gsync vs gspot, k skull ur knowledge ends here, now we talk bout gspot, go back to gaming haha btw hrd, would be more interesting an article on "rubber" khm...lol
seems very cool and nice, but F2 for 3 reasons : 1st 60hz ; 2nd 1500 euro only for the monitors and if u see the pc specs there for run such stuff u need other 5000 euro of pc ; 3rd 40fps average (60 is already shit...). but yea would be cool with 144hz and up to 100-120 (even just 80 would be enough) fps and i stolen money from skull's credit card, admitting he got one..
Sure it looks nice but for 1497 euros, I don't think the costs outweigh the benefits.. also does anyone else think it'll be harder to game on multiple monitors? I only tried it a couple times and I didn't like it, to each their own I guess.
ps. I love how F2 has become synonymous for "disagree/dislike"
ps. I love how F2 has become synonymous for "disagree/dislike"
lol ye its damn funny how quake got inside our grammar, funny implementation
You don't think it looks nice? For only 1497€
"Skill is when luck becomes a habit".