Rail must kill instantly or not?
Tanaka, I understand your intention for voting point 1. No problem. But the reason, makes no sense
Hi Nana
I prefer instarail. The way I see it is, there are many differant server cfg's to suit all. So people have many choices. But there will allways be people that cfg doesnt suit completely, you cant make a cfg to please all its impossible, so I think they should just be left as they are otherwise this will go on forever and the original roots of excessive will be lost amongst cfg's to suit all.
Regards
Foxy.
voted yes... Rail must always kill instantly
I think rail should be gun what always kills instatly.
You are describing Railonly.
Pls ppl, ask yourself why do we have other weapons on plus ?
i voted for 2nd option. its quake 3 )allweapon( and quake never was had a instarail pls leave us insta rail for INSTA matches (railOnly)
railgun is a railgun this weapon in q2 was the greatest and in q3 is still railgun , one shot must die, this is classic for me. But armors can be usefull too but not for Railgun.
instarail ofc!!! really i came to e+ coz of that, and now some1 taking away all the fun even without asking what ppl think... thx Nana for this poll - it really shows what ppl think about this and yea, as i thought instarail almost doubles in scores... so - fuck off armours!!!!
Pls ppl, ask yourself why do we have other weapons on plus ?
The people who made Quake 3 put them in there ???
I would like to also use other weapons, but as it's the weapon for instakills, so there is no choice on plus cfg than having the Rail equiped. I would even like to try out and go for 2 hits with and without armor in a seperate cfg on full HP. My question is, if it would change the behaviour of people or if they would use the Rail twice in a row anyway as it's simply most senseful to them. Should depend on the distance actually, but if people are used to it..
Insta for ffa, 600 dmg for cw's and without powerups.