wrote:

its not worth the effort due to lacking structure of judges who actually decide if the proof is valid or not.

yeah thats one of the biggest problems....as I see it (correct me if I'm wrong) for now there are only 2 (TWO) people in the whole community that know how to check the demos for strange activities (you and camel, maybe there are more but you are the only who are actually doing it)....is there a way that you could teach someone else of commands used? (for example hitbox analysis command and all the other stuff)

Making a public topic about rules of detections and methods would just boost the number of ways that cheaters can operate....

We have very few people that know how to do that, which compromises their decisions in eyes of the rest of community, as decisions can be made subjectively and not objectively...
So the idea is: let's find a trusted group of people (for the start around 5 judges) to whom you and camel would pass your knowledge to, and then they could make analysis and vote about the suspicious player based on what they would be banned/cleared of the suspicion.

lol Shadow you are 16, all know this:D see, you also lie about your age:) lol. this is real epic fail :DDD

wrote:

So the idea is: let's find a trusted group of people (for the start around 5 judges) to whom you and camel would pass your knowledge to, and then they could make analysis and vote about the suspicious player based on what they would be banned/cleared of the suspicion.

'we' will see what we can do.

wrote:

'we' will see what we can do.

lovely!

wrote:

да идите нахуй втроем!

//Translate
Go on dick three together!xdFucking liar...