Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

103 replies [Last post]
28. March 2007 - 18:55
#31
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?
tartaros wrote:

SUGGESTION

New clans take some time to get forums here. They must first show that mean business. Soooo how about this:

"New clans post their clan wars but they won't be ranked. After they complete 5 clan wars and show that they mean business their wars will be ranked (along with the first 5 of course)"

----

wich clan will play vs new clans then?
well i dont really have a choice...

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
28. March 2007 - 19:06
#32
tartaros
GreekPecker's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

A new clan challenges XXX clan in let's say 7th position. The 7th clan wins. How many points would they actually win? Not much i suppose. My point is that one way or another old clans have nothing to gain by playing against new clans. Only experience and fun...nothing compared to precious points, right?

Top
28. March 2007 - 19:19
#33
UnknownUser807
Reno's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

3on3 is ok i guess, as long as everyone is happy to play

Is there a rule to stop clans playing the same clans over and over again (to guarantee scoring more wins) If not there should be Thinking:

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin

Top
28. March 2007 - 19:21
#34
"C4-KICKZ"
KickZ's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

how about we split Total Rank up in Premiere League and Secondary league?

top 30 clans go Premiere, rest is Secondairy

Secundairy top 5 can climb to Primairy league after x-time or cw's

<drt_nihil> we about wolf and wolf is here

(@enha) damn you, people are dancing, instead of work
(@drt_foksie) she mutated

Top
28. March 2007 - 20:44
#35
Sriam
Sriam's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?
"C4-KICKZ" wrote:

how about we split Total Rank up in Premiere League and Secondary league?

top 30 clans go Premiere, rest is Secondairy

Secundairy top 5 can climb to Primairy league after x-time or cw's

wow like in soccer xD good idea... Big grin

coolest clan of e+ : Hyper!
coolest guy of e+ : okinex!

Top
28. March 2007 - 21:11
#36
"C4-KICKZ"
KickZ's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?
Sriam wrote:

"C4-KICKZ" wrote:
how about we split Total Rank up in Premiere League and Secondary league?

top 30 clans go Premiere, rest is Secondairy

Secundairy top 5 can climb to Primairy league after x-time or cw's

wow like in soccer xD good idea... Big grin

yes, similar...

new clans will have to start in secondairy and in Secondairy 3 vs 3 is allowed.
In Primairy, minimum is 4vs4

something like that?

<drt_nihil> we about wolf and wolf is here

(@enha) damn you, people are dancing, instead of work
(@drt_foksie) she mutated

Top
28. March 2007 - 21:16
#37
x.foksie'loy.drt?
foksie's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

both Tartaros and Kx actualy came up with nice ideas.

we should probably exapand on those.

btw, in most democratic countries it takes 75% of majority to change a "constitutional" rule. So 2 votes more are waaay to low.

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

Top
28. March 2007 - 22:48
#38
bert
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

hmm, how about new clans can play there first 3 cw's with 3vs3 minimal?
thats very easy to check, a few clicks in ranking...

Top
28. March 2007 - 23:17
#39
*A*C|_ASS*WON]<O
vroomfoondel's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

still dont get it. whats the big deal here? so some new clans have started playing and as a result we had a gazillion clan wars this month. and suddenly all of us seem to be afraid that just cos of that they mite just stop playing and then we won't have serious clan wars any more. just how exactly does that follow? i dont see the logic. no matter how many clans we have in total, we're always gonna have the same serious clans arent we? the same solid, active clans are still gonna be there arent they, irrespective of what the other clans are doing?

i dont see y we have to do anything new at all. if it aint broke (and it aint, no matter what renas twisted logic is), dont bloody try and fix it.

#e+pickup #excessiveplus #class.clan

Top
28. March 2007 - 23:20
#40
kek
Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts:
Are you for minimum 4 vs 4 players for ranked CW ?

I like kx's idea as well...3 votes up.

Top